- Joined
- May 27, 2007
- Messages
- 299
I read his knife book a few years ago. He advocated several modifications to a Buck 119 fixed blade to include:
1. Drilling a hole in the top finger guard (quillion) to use the knife as a sighting tool.
2. Etching a clinometer on the sides of the blade to use in conjunction with said sight.
3. Drilling a hole near the tip to give better leverage when using the pommel as a hammer (you would put cord through the hole and swing the blade so that the pommel would crack onto whatever you were hammering with greater force), and,
4. Polishing the blood groove to make it a signaling mirror.
He had other ideas too that I cannot remember.
Anyone else read this book? Thoughts? When I first read it years ago it made sense to me, but I was a novice to knives (still am in many ways). I see that almost none of his ideas ever made it to production or with folks on Blade Forum. Was he an overlooked revolutionary or a did he really justhave bad ideas? What do you think?
1. Drilling a hole in the top finger guard (quillion) to use the knife as a sighting tool.
2. Etching a clinometer on the sides of the blade to use in conjunction with said sight.
3. Drilling a hole near the tip to give better leverage when using the pommel as a hammer (you would put cord through the hole and swing the blade so that the pommel would crack onto whatever you were hammering with greater force), and,
4. Polishing the blood groove to make it a signaling mirror.
He had other ideas too that I cannot remember.
Anyone else read this book? Thoughts? When I first read it years ago it made sense to me, but I was a novice to knives (still am in many ways). I see that almost none of his ideas ever made it to production or with folks on Blade Forum. Was he an overlooked revolutionary or a did he really justhave bad ideas? What do you think?