Evolution of a knife nut.

Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
17,675
The evolution of a knife nut.

I’ve been a knife nut all my life. An obsessed one at that. From an early age, I wouldn’t dream of walking out the door without my pocket knife. At least when I was in school, a boy having a pocket knife was pretty normal. Things did change though later. At home I watched my old man go through everyday with his little Case peanut in his pocket, and he’d cut whatever he needed with that little slip of a knife. Being young and full of ideas swirling in my head, I was sure the peanut was just too small a knife to go out the door with.



Many times I carried multiple knives. You can never beside what’s going to happen in th course of the day right? I mean that one knife in a pocket could go dull, or lost, or it just may be inadequate if marooned in the arctic, or lost in the mountains in a blizzard. What all that had to do with a boy living in suburban Maryland, I’m not really sure. But an excuse to carry another knife was not really needed to be a good one.



Boy Scouts. This was a period in my life where I learned what a knife was really capable of. We had this scoutmaster, a man named Mr. Van. He was a retired marine that has been in some very bad places in WW2. When he took his shirt off on some of our canoe trips or swimming in the river, he had some interesting scars on him. Small puckered ones in front that matched the larger puckered ones in the back where they exited. A livid ridge of scar tissue running along his ribs where it looked like a bayonet has skidded. We didn’t ask about the other guy.



So what kind of knife did this retied career battle scarred Marine carry? A simple little two blade jack about 3 1/4 inches closed. Jigged bone handles and carbon blades stained a dark gray, with that bright little ribbon of razor sharp edge running up the blade. But Mr. Van did have a special knife he’d carry. His old Remington scout knife was clipped on his belt. A real Remington from the 1930’s. To us scouts, it was the excalibur of knives in our life. Us kids carried our scout knives everywhere.



Later in life I enlisted in the army and my knife addiction took off. I got into SAK’s, a Buck stockman, and even a Randall. The army had given me a nice new Camillus MK2 when we arrived in Vietnam, and it got shoved down in the duffle bag as we were a Engineer outfit, and the big Camillus was just too much on a job site. The squad tool box had two machetes in there, so we just used them when big cutting was needed. But we all had our pocket knives. The army issue TL-29 and the so called demo knife in good supply, as was private bought Buck knives and SAK’s. Buck had come out with the 110 by this time, and by the time I got out of the army, every swinging Richard had the black pouch on his belt. It was THE knife everyone carried.



Going through civilian life after my discharge, I continued to carry at least two knives every day. Mostly is was a full size Buck Stockman with a SAK in the other pocket. Never can tell what’s gonna happen. I continued to try other patterns, like sodbusters, lockblades, small fixed blades. Always looking for that perfect knife and buying more than I needed.



But a curious thing did take place. I noticed as I aged and made the trip into middle age, my carrying knives got smaller. I’m not exactly sure why, I was doing the same thing for a living, a machinist. Working in machine shop every day, you need a sharp tool on you. There was plastic banding to cut as well as that grimy fiber reenforced tape that held the bundles of lathe stock. Heavy duty cardboard boxes to open that held parts to be modified on the mill, and other things. For a knife nut, you could say it was a target rich environment.



When I got out of the army with a 50% disability from injuries occurred while on active duty, I was eligible for the educational training program. This led me to the apprenticeship as a machinist, and most of the guys who worked with and were my teachers were older guys. The all carried a knife, but were not knife nuts. It’s just like they knew a sharp blade was needed, but they were didn’t really care about it. They all carried a small pen knife or even a box cutter. On the shops work benches there was Stanley utility knives laying around for use. I think this was the start of my downsizing. I saw all these older guys who did all this manual hands-on kind of work, using small blades that I had never would thought of. Kind of like echoes of watching my father with is little Case peanut. It made me think, always a semi dangerous thing for me.



By this time I was a minivan driving soccer dad, getting the kids to soccer, Lacrosse, softball, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, .22 rifle league and a lot of other activities. With three kids close in age, it was a hectic time. Even seeing combat in Vietnam, I was never felt feeling quite as shell shocked and disoriented as hustling the kids to their many activities. During it all, there was always need of a sharp knife for something. But I also made another discovery out of necessity. That my dad had been right all along; it didn’t have to big, just sharp. Raising three kids, there had been an increasing amount of stuff in pockets. Spare bandana’s, folded up paper towels, hand sanitizer, small fist aid kit and bandaids, rubber bands, small coil of twine, and lots of other stuff kids need while out and about. This on top of my own stuff like pipe, tobacco pouch, lighter, small flashlight, pocket knife, car keys, pencil and pad. Pocket real estate got to be a premium.



This was also the time when I went on a hunting trip with a co-worker. Andy was a big old country boy from down in Virginia by Mount Rogers. Andy got his deer, and I offered him my fixed blade Randall, but he just remarked that he wasn’t skinning a brontosaurus, and he proceeded to field dress his deer with his everyday pocket knife, a Buck 303 cadet. He made a bonafide surgeon look sloppy. That little 2 1/2 inch blade in his hand did the neatest job of field dressing I’d ever seen. Again, it made me think of my father and his little Case jackknife.



Time went on and I continued to downsize my stuff. Everything got smaller. I was on a quest to find the smallest item that could still do the job it was designed to do. Being an ultra light backpacker was part of it. Being partly disabled and needing a cane from my right foot getting mangled in the army, I needed to cut every ounce I could. The smallest flashlight, the smallest knife, that smallest lightest stove, and so on. It bled over to my day to life. One day, I dropped my dad’s old Case peanut in my pocket. He had passed away and I kept is little knife on my dresser for sentiment. I told myself it was an “experiment.” I tried it for a week, and then a month. Then I deliberately left all my other knives home. Nothing bad happened. The world didn’t stop, Russian paratroopers didn’t drop out of the sky, and no buffalo’s needed skinning in my neck of the woods.



Now as an old fart, I’ve found a very pragmatic outlook on life. A Big scare a month ago also made me think about things. Waking 5 o’clock in the morning with chest pains and pain running down both arms was startling to say the least. None of my thoughts were wasted on things. I woke my better half next to me and told her I loved her. At that moment I had deep regrets that if this was the big one, and my life was going to end in the next few minutes, I wouldn’t get to say goodbye to the people I loved the most. My kids and grandkids. No ’things’ mattered to me. The things I owned didn’t mean Jack shite, and Jack was on vacation in ‘Vegas. At the ER they hooked me up to machines that beeped and clicked. As it turned out, it was just a muscle spasm, but it made me think.



I’m still a knife nut, but it has taken a very distant back seat to life in general. I still would not think of walking out the door without a pocket knife on me, but I’m not that particular anymore. A small sharp blade is all that’s needed for most of our urbanized suburban life. Most days my only used knife is the little Victorinox classic on my keyring. Sometimes I even use the 3 inch Boker pen knife with the rosewood scales. But it really doesn’t matter what knife I have on me anymore. My dad was right, it dosn’t have to be big, just sharp.

These two have done great etc pocket knife duties. My youngest granddaughter has my Remington peanut now. The Boker pen is still a great carry.

 
Last edited:
The journey is important. So is Life. Sometimes "things" are important too if you don't have the thing you need. But with knives, that seldom happens with me. You have to keep things in perspective or I think you do.

I didn't turn into a knife knut until the 90's, and that is about when I started carrying SAKs which is about as knutless as you can get. This corresponds to when I started attending gun and knife shows very regularly. The show thing actually started in the mid 80's. Now I seldom attend gun shows, but I enjoy knife shows a lot.

I would clarify the knife knut thing to say that I am a functional knife knut. I enjoy reading about all the super steels that knife blades are made of, but I don't have a deep need to try everything. I also enjoy seeing what's new in this world. Seldom will you find me without a knife in my pocket.

In most cases, a small peanut or pen knife size works for just about everything short of self defense. That is one of the reasons I like SAKs, but lean toward the larger ones.

Size wise, I tried larger knives both fixed and folding and was never comfortable with a large knife in my pocket. So, I have settled for the time being in the 3" blade length (give or take about 1/4" usually). With fixed blades, generally 4"-5", sometimes 3ish.

Went through the Rambo stage and I still love a big knife. I just don't have much use for them and at some point reason enters into the picture and you simply say.... I like that beastly thing, but I'm NOT going to buy it.

I suspect your scout master might have carried something different today than he did in the 50's and 60's. Things have changed a lot knife-wise.
 
Last edited:
First of all, I am glad you are well and that your medical issue turned out to be a minor one.

Nevertheless, I don't think you can still consider yourself a knife nut if you are "not that particular anymore" and "it really doesn’t matter what knife [you] have on [yourself] anymore." You indeed recounted the evolution of a knife nut but what you evolved into is someone who isn't nutty about knives. :)
 
It's what's inside that counts and jack knife is still a nut.

In my early 20's I had a similar experience with the "pain" and thought I was going to die... turned out to be nerves mostly as I was under a lot of pressure.
 
Thanks for the post, jackknife.

Back in 2013, I had a bit of a scare myself. I was exercising and noticed a pain/tight feeling in my chest, and difficulty catching my breath with a very rapid heartbeat that went on for a while. I checked into the hospital and ended up having to stay overnight. They hooked me up to a machine, withdrew some blood, and after a very uncomfortable night, next day I had a stress test, got injected with something and was put into one of those machines to take photos of the heart. Luckily, it turned out my heart is "healthy enough to run a marathon", as the doctor put it. It was actually some trapped gas or heartburn(?). But the experience was a scary one. At the time I was only 50.

As far as knife carry, I find I prefer a blade no longer than 3.5" to 3.6" long in a folder. But lately I've been EDCing 3" blades and under. I still carry multiple knives: two SAKs (Pioneer and Executive), and lately for my clip folders, a David Boye pointy-bladed boat knife w/marlin spike, and/or my CRK small Inkosi.

Things can always change. For me, the 2 SAKs are a constant. They just complement each other too well for my daily life. Any 'knife knut' will evolve in their own individual way. It's the similarities AND the differences that make life interesting.

Jim
 
Last edited:
I enjoyed your story. Thanks for sharing that. When I was in the military(1990-1993) I carried a full size Leatherman and a Buck 112 but I too slowly downsized. I noticed as you get older all that stuff seems to get heavier.
 
I understand completely about small knives and the minimalist thing, but your great stories have been a bit of an issue for me.

I love knives and carry what I love, but how can I carry a fixed blade or Buck 110 when your stories remind me that my peanut or Vic recruit are all I need ?
Obviously I love them and carry them anyways but the thought that I'm carrying way more than I need is definitely there and it's all thanks to you.
 
I understand completely about small knives and the minimalist thing.... Obviously I love them and carry them anyways but the thought that I'm carrying way more than I need is definitely there and it's all thanks to you.
I tried to carry a small stockman (3.1" closed) and I just missed my larger folder. It actually did everything I asked it to do, but I was and am more comfortable currently with something a little larger. I have a number of traditional knives including SAKs that are in a holding pattern for the day I decide I don't need the larger knife. My steadfast EDC is a 111mm SAK (the big size, but not the biggest anymore) and I add another knife to that usually. The current one is a Steel Will Mini Cutjack in M390 that I like a lot.
 
I tried to carry a small stockman (3.1" closed) and I just missed my larger folder. It actually did everything I asked it to do, but I was and am more comfortable currently with something a little larger. I have a number of traditional knives including SAKs that are in a holding pattern for the day I decide I don't need the larger knife. My steadfast EDC is a 111mm SAK (the big size, but not the biggest anymore) and I add another knife to that usually. The current one is a Steel Will Mini Cutjack in M390 that I like a lot.
I have no problem with smaller knives, this is my EDC for the week.

At one point I was used to larger knives and couldn't carry something like this though.
 
Ha! Big honkin' folders for me. Just kidding. My hope is there will always be enough evolving knuts to buy my stache when I get the energy to sell.
 
My late dad always had a knife, having been a blue-collar worker his entire life. Over the years, he's had (and used hard) a Camillus scout-style knife w/wooden handle; a medium-sized .camillus 2-blade jackknife; a really tiny, all-metal pocketknife from Sheffield that was barely used; a Buck 110; and a Christy knife, among others. Most of his knives were very heavily-used. He wasn't a knife nut.

My dad had extremely thick fingers from lots of hard labor. He had grown up on a large family farm in the 1920s and 30s, and later worked on a professional tuna boat and as a gardener. As the years went by, he could no longer use the nail nicks on his pocketknives like before. In fact, it's probable he always had to pinch the blades open. So any little pocketknife like a peanut would have been useless to him. I'm guessing that's why he tried the Christy knife; he seemed to have a few of them lying around. I also remember he had some small, cheap, all-metal 'friction' folders with tiny sheepsfoot blades that stores used to sell near the counter back in the '70s. And of course, the Buck 110 would have been easy for him to open.

Jim
 
Some of us have special needs that develop over time when it comes to knives. My brother in law has a hard time opening slippies now (especially GEC's with a strong spring) and I suspect he will be gravitating to a flipper or assisted opener in the coming months. I'd buy him one for Christmas, but he's picky and I can't plan for picky. He's also a knut. He tends to prefer something relatively large, but he has a LionSteel Small Opera (or did until he gave it to his son) which you pinch open. I picked one up because I liked his. Used it today as I was working on reports and at my desk most of the day in "very comfortable" clothes (home office). He does like his Buck 110's, but I have never seen him carry one in recent years.
 
Thanks for sharing your story, I enjoyed reading about your evolution.

I am a collector who loves knives. My collection has evolved over the years while pursuing the perfect EDC. Boy scout knife when in school was a common thing when I was growing up. Buck knives on the belt during Jr High and High School were also common. Swiss army knives from college until the nut in me awakened thanks to Spyderco, Kershaw, Case, CRKT, ZT and Benchmade. While my tastes have changed over time and my desired carry modes have evolved to allow for other pocket items, it is interesting to see how others have approached the same daily question. What do I need to carry today?

The true statement is it doesn't matter how large the knife is as long as it is sharp really applies to me as well.

Thanks for sharing.
 
I have no problem with smaller knives, this is my EDC for the week.

At one point I was used to larger knives and couldn't carry something like this though.

You could go a very long way and not find a better every day pocket knife than a Victorinox recruit!:thumbsup::thumbsup:

Has what you need for most times and nothing that you don't.
 
Appreciated reading your story, and the most important thing is, glad that you are ok. :)

It's cool to see the "evolution" of a life-long knife user, to learn about the knives you used in the past, and what was popular around the time of Viet Nam before I was even born. I didn't know, for instance, about the "cool factor" of the Buck 110 at the time, although I've had Buck 110's since I was a kid.

It's also cool to see that you have a perspective on life: that ultimately people and relationships matter more than things.

Finally, I'm interested to hear of you getting to a stage of minimalism and going with the smallest, most basic knife that will get the job done. It's not so much which knife you pick that's interesting to me, but this fundamental idea that is influencing you. I've had some similar development in my thinking over the last few years, basically a minimalism that says I don't need to have so many things, they just create clutter and stress in your life, as well as spending a lot of time and $$ caring for all of it, plus it CAN cause you to neglect those "more important" things in life that you mention. I still don't have it all figured out yet, but I'm making progress. In general, I get FEWER things, and the things I get, I get more high quality, multi-purpose things that will serve for many uses. I've drastically reduced my firearms to just a handful, like one sixth of what I had just 10 years ago. The ones I have are high quality, in common/primary calibers, I shoot them often and enjoy them more because they are good quality. Same approach with knives, I probably have 1/3 of what I had about a decade ago. And tools. And computers. Electronic devices. Clothing. Home solvents: I'm learning to use more basic ingredients like bleach, vinegar, baking soda, castile soap, a few solvents like mineral spirits, and just a handful of common lubes that cover all lube needs of all types. It really does simplify life a bit and make it a bit less cluttered and stressful (and less expensive). Also there's an enjoyment or satisfaction you get from learning to innovate, adapt, figure out a different use for a tool or homemade solvent to handle a problem or fix something, rather than go and buy yet another gadget or specialized chemical for every new task you run into.

Back to the subject of your evolution to "smallest knife that gets the job done." I've posted this elsewhere, but recently I visited a museum in the Great Plains (this one was in Nebraska near Kearney) where, among other things, they had implements of life used by the pioneers, US military, and native Americans who lived in the area in the 1800's. The thing that struck me about a lot of the native American edged tools (the ones I saw were mostly made of stone, or bone): how relatively small and thin they were. Unlike a lot of us, these folks were not city/urban dwellers carrying gigantic "EDC" (note the emphasis on CARRY, rather than usage) knives that get rarely, or lightly used. Instead, they used their edged tools almost daily, for all kinds of tasks, and the tools I saw were quite specialized to various purposes. But all of them in general appeared smaller, and thinner, than a lot of the blades we get into. It struck me how these practical knife users, were able to apparently get by quite well, and perform quite sophisticated edged tool tasks, with tools that by our standards would be almost laughable and primitive. My point is not that we should all create little 2" stone knives and throw away our fancy ZT "hard use" folders (I enjoy mine as much as the next guy, although I have a lot less than I used to, because I realize now in my case it's mostly about enjoyment not really a need). But the point is, it's just worth reflecting on what you really need--as you have--what's most important in life, and what is really the right tool for a given job. People will have different answers to those questions, as you do, but it's at least worth asking and thinking it through.

Thanks for such a thoughtful post!
 
Back to the subject of your evolution to "smallest knife that gets the job done." I've posted this elsewhere, but recently I visited a museum in the Great Plains (this one was in Nebraska near Kearney) where, among other things, they had implements of life used by the pioneers, US military, and native Americans who lived in the area in the 1800's. The thing that struck me about a lot of the native American edged tools (the ones I saw were mostly made of stone, or bone): how relatively small and thin they were. Unlike a lot of us, these folks were not city/urban dwellers carrying gigantic "EDC" (note the emphasis on CARRY, rather than usage) knives that get rarely, or lightly used. Instead, they used their edged tools almost daily, for all kinds of tasks, and the tools I saw were quite specialized to various purposes. But all of them in general appeared smaller, and thinner, than a lot of the blades we get into. It struck me how these practical knife users, were able to apparently get by quite well, and perform quite sophisticated edged tool tasks, with tools that by our standards would be almost laughable and primitive. My point is not that we should all create little 2" stone knives and throw away our fancy ZT "hard use" folders (I enjoy mine as much as the next guy, although I have a lot less than I used to, because I realize now in my case it's mostly about enjoyment not really a need). But the point is, it's just worth reflecting on what you really need--as you have--what's most important in life, and what is really the right tool for a given job. People will have different answers to those questions, as you do, but it's at least worth asking and thinking it through.

Thanks for such a thoughtful post!

You're welcome, max!

Funny you mention the Great Plains Indians, as a visit to a similar museum and National park spurred my travel to the minimalism thoughts. In 1997, the better half and I did a month long road trip around the country. Camped out in all the big parks like Badlands, Yellowstone, Bryce, Grand Canyon, Arches, and Mesa Verde. It was at Mesa Verda, the cliff dwellings that I got an epiphany. The old Anastsi were a Stone Age culture, and did those fantastic stone work cliff dwellings. A park ranger ws giving a demonstration at the museum up top nohow effective stone tools were.

He had a haunch of a road killed deer, and he had some obsidian chunks. He used a stick to strike off a index finger size flake and then proceeded to skin and slice up the deer leg meat. That stone flake sliced right through the deer skin and meat like a serrated steak knife. He then cut yukka fiber wih it and it cut right through the fibers like a modenknfe through string. Very impressive. They had samples of real tools/knives that had been found in the ruins, and none were very big. Maybe inch and a half blades. Yet they processed game, harvested corn, cut and processed yukka fibers for making everything from sleeping mats to sandals, and ropes.

This was about the time I was downsizing from a full size Buck stockman to the smaller cadet. Not long after I went to a Case peanut and it still did all my day to day cutting.

My gun collection went the same way, and I found out what you said about less clutter in life. It made life a lot less stressful and I ended up shooting better with just a few guns that I knew well.

It took me most of a lifetime to finest that less is really indeed more sometimes.

At the mountain man museum in Colorado, I saw real fur trade era knives and tomahawks, and I was surprised at how much smaller and thinner they were. Most were just kitchen type butcher knives with a sheath made to fit. I can only guess the mountain men were not interested in hype, just effective tools!
 
Back
Top