ron_m80
Tempered Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2009
- Messages
- 8,155
I have been doing a little reading, and I am beginning to wonder how great a loss the HT method of Mr. Richtig was to the knife community.
His knives even predate my interest in blades, hell they predate me. Levine's Guide to Knives and their values #4, explains that Mr. Richtig was one of the first to prove his knives in a fantastic manner, reportedly hammering a steel buggy axle into slices with his knife over an anvil.
I personally must take into account the sensationalism of early reporting I suspect occurred, and question the temper of the buggy axle. But there must be some truth to it. Seeing as how we have a wealth of knowledge on these forums I am curious to hear what the more experienced have to say, what do you think?
Mr Richtig's knives, or INFI? :thumbup:
His knives even predate my interest in blades, hell they predate me. Levine's Guide to Knives and their values #4, explains that Mr. Richtig was one of the first to prove his knives in a fantastic manner, reportedly hammering a steel buggy axle into slices with his knife over an anvil.
I personally must take into account the sensationalism of early reporting I suspect occurred, and question the temper of the buggy axle. But there must be some truth to it. Seeing as how we have a wealth of knowledge on these forums I am curious to hear what the more experienced have to say, what do you think?
Mr Richtig's knives, or INFI? :thumbup: