Fact

  • Thread starter Thread starter w
  • Start date Start date
The holes in those so-called facts are so big even I can see right through them. I'm just not buying it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: w
Yeah, I know...I was hoping that somebody liked the knife enough to join the discussion.
I was serious, though - not a fan of having holes in handles...it's been an automatic "no" for me for many years. (Not sure why - I've got a couple from 20 yrs ago, and those holes don't bother me.)
 
I do like the look and will be getting one before the end of the year. I felt they were overpriced and held off on buying but going for it now just based purely on looks.
 
I had one. I liked it, but moved it on. It’s daggery design, while aesthetically pleasing, does not make it the most practical, and I opted to find something more useful. Of course, now that we’re talking about it, I miss it.
 
I had one. I liked it, but moved it on. It’s daggery design, while aesthetically pleasing, does not make it the most practical, and I opted to find something more useful. Of course, now that we’re talking about it, I miss it.
Why are you still thinking in terms of practicality, do better.
 
I've got one and I love it. I bought it specifically because it is different. I've got plenty of more practical drop points, but I had no spearpoints in the collection.


It's a very sleek and slim knife. Even slimmer than a 940. It's almost like carrying a fat pen in the pocket. The milling on the handles is nice too. The tip on it is like a needle. It's no lightsaber slicer but it is seriously pokey.

I've been considering the Auto Fact too. Such a good looking knife, but a little on the expensive side.
 
Back
Top