My Kershaw Vapor and Camillus EDC 154CM came in the mail Friday finally, after waiting a month an a half. Bladematrix lost my order and had to be slapped around a little to get it right. They gave me free shipping though for my trouble.
Anyway...
I've been practicing my sharpening and have gotten pretty good. I can get a shaving edge with a soft Arkansas stone freehand now pretty consistently. I also have a Lansky set that does a good job.
I decided to compare the Kershaw to an Aitor fixed blade that I got off eBay as a blade to practice on. The Aitor was reprofiled with the Lansky and finished on the 2000 grit ceramic stone, then polished on a buffing wheel with red rouge compound. It shaves effortlessly. Not bad for a $7 knife.
Anyway, I put both under a microscope to compare the edges. The Aitor looks almost mirror polished at 100x, but at 430x I can clearly see the marks left by the hone. At 100x, the Kershaw is perfectly smooth , and at 430x it still looks almost mirror finished. I think it's significantly smoother than even a new x-acto blade I looked at a long time ago. It's smoother than any of the electron micrographs in Lee's "The Complete Guide to Sharpening" even.
To get this finish should I go to a fine waterstone before buffing again? I have a 1000/6000 waterstone that I haven't really used yet, and my dad has one that might be even finer. After that, is there a buffing compound that might be a better choice than the rouge?
(FYI, I always buff away from the edge)
I'm just playing with different sharpening methods here. I have a few cheap test blades (the Aitor, some Master folders, a Pakistani piece of junk I got by mistake) and I try different methods on them.
Also- I got the Harbor Freight 3 pack of 2x6" diamond stones for $12. They're pretty coarse; I doubt DMT has anything to worry about but they're good for reprofiling. Regardless, $12 for 3 diamond stones is unbeatable.
I used to be able to get a good image with a video camera from my microscope. If I can get a decent picture with my digital camera I'll post some images of these edges.
Anyway...
I've been practicing my sharpening and have gotten pretty good. I can get a shaving edge with a soft Arkansas stone freehand now pretty consistently. I also have a Lansky set that does a good job.
I decided to compare the Kershaw to an Aitor fixed blade that I got off eBay as a blade to practice on. The Aitor was reprofiled with the Lansky and finished on the 2000 grit ceramic stone, then polished on a buffing wheel with red rouge compound. It shaves effortlessly. Not bad for a $7 knife.
Anyway, I put both under a microscope to compare the edges. The Aitor looks almost mirror polished at 100x, but at 430x I can clearly see the marks left by the hone. At 100x, the Kershaw is perfectly smooth , and at 430x it still looks almost mirror finished. I think it's significantly smoother than even a new x-acto blade I looked at a long time ago. It's smoother than any of the electron micrographs in Lee's "The Complete Guide to Sharpening" even.
To get this finish should I go to a fine waterstone before buffing again? I have a 1000/6000 waterstone that I haven't really used yet, and my dad has one that might be even finer. After that, is there a buffing compound that might be a better choice than the rouge?
(FYI, I always buff away from the edge)
I'm just playing with different sharpening methods here. I have a few cheap test blades (the Aitor, some Master folders, a Pakistani piece of junk I got by mistake) and I try different methods on them.
Also- I got the Harbor Freight 3 pack of 2x6" diamond stones for $12. They're pretty coarse; I doubt DMT has anything to worry about but they're good for reprofiling. Regardless, $12 for 3 diamond stones is unbeatable.
I used to be able to get a good image with a video camera from my microscope. If I can get a decent picture with my digital camera I'll post some images of these edges.