Ive tried 36,40,50 and 60 for initial rough grinding but never really settled on one..Lots of folks like 36 for hogging but just as many seem to like 60 for more control? Which do you like better?
36 for profiling and I've been liking 60 lately for the thinner .110 AEB-L. Goes quickly enough and less risk for me of a 36 grit gouge in the spine to work out.
I always start my bevels with a well worn belt and switch to a sharp belt after a couple of passes... if you start with a fresh one, the sharp edge of the steel seems to knock half the grit off the belt!
3M 984f's in 36 grit unless the stock is thin then 60 grit works well. If you have not tries the 984f ceramic belts they come highly recommended by many.
36 or 40 for profiling and to start the grind. I leave plenty, go to 60 to get it within a couple thousandths, then 120 to clean up the grind lines and even out everything.
Good answer here!
for thin folder's blade i even start with a 120 and take my time; 80 for very close forged to shape blades regardless the thickness.
Use the fresh, lower grit i can wich doesn't leave scratches under the intended final surface, being very careful with the plunge area.
I like somewhat used 36 grit for rough bevel grinding and then using a new 50 or 60 to dial in the geometry I am after, the higher grits are for getting rid of previous grit scratches only. No appreciable change in geometry after 50 or 60 grits.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.