is the only functional difference in these two really just the tweezers? on the victorinox website they didn't even bother with a different picture for the red huntsman vs fieldmaster, it's the exact same picture used for both of them. the standard plain red huntsman is $0.44 more than the fieldmaster for one less feature on the river. I just find it hard to believe they would make two identical knives one sans a feature plus a logo instead of just making a boyscout version of the fieldmaster, since the huntsman can be had with or without the logo. I suppose the huntsman can be had in different colored scales as well, but two nearly identical knives when different colored scales and a logo aren't redesigns or anything just strikes me as inefficient. are there more differences that aren't listed?