All I know so far is that the 1000 grit waterstone does infact cut S30V fast, faster than SC paper, for me faster than a belt grinder.
A little further research and I found out that the grit rating system for waterstones is NOT the same CAMI (our 'normal' rating system). Here's a little table:
Waterstone - grit size (aprox)
320 - 280
1000 - 700
2000 - 1100
4000 - 1500 (about the same as green chrome)
8000 - 2000
So moving from a 2000 stone to an 8000 stone is only doubling the grit.
I bought the 1000 stone and the finish is not the same as 1000 paper. Then I found out that I was really using 700 equivalent - that looked about right. The finish also looks different. How can I explain it - more matt. The grit doesn't form the long lines you get with paper. And the line depth is very consistent with the stone.
The other thing I found out is my flats aren't as flat as I thought! I went from a 220 grit belt to the stone, and found divits. There is no question I can get a flatter surface off the stone. But still, imagine a 220 belt to 1000 grit waterstone (like 700 paper) and the 220 lines come off in a few minutes.
So I ordered a 320 waterstone to flatten the bevels and a 2000 stone to start the polish.
At this point I believe the combination 320, 1000, 2000 (which is like 280, 700, 1100 in paper terms) is going to work for a foundation. I might finish with paper, don't know yet.
Hope someone finds this helpful. I know if this does work I'll save a fortune in belts and time.
Steve
A little further research and I found out that the grit rating system for waterstones is NOT the same CAMI (our 'normal' rating system). Here's a little table:
Waterstone - grit size (aprox)
320 - 280
1000 - 700
2000 - 1100
4000 - 1500 (about the same as green chrome)
8000 - 2000
So moving from a 2000 stone to an 8000 stone is only doubling the grit.
I bought the 1000 stone and the finish is not the same as 1000 paper. Then I found out that I was really using 700 equivalent - that looked about right. The finish also looks different. How can I explain it - more matt. The grit doesn't form the long lines you get with paper. And the line depth is very consistent with the stone.
The other thing I found out is my flats aren't as flat as I thought! I went from a 220 grit belt to the stone, and found divits. There is no question I can get a flatter surface off the stone. But still, imagine a 220 belt to 1000 grit waterstone (like 700 paper) and the 220 lines come off in a few minutes.
So I ordered a 320 waterstone to flatten the bevels and a 2000 stone to start the polish.
At this point I believe the combination 320, 1000, 2000 (which is like 280, 700, 1100 in paper terms) is going to work for a foundation. I might finish with paper, don't know yet.
Hope someone finds this helpful. I know if this does work I'll save a fortune in belts and time.
Steve