Buzzbait :
I've batoned the heck out of a convex ground D2 Dozier and had no edge problems.
I have used a custom in CPM-10V 62/63 HRC from Phil Wilson to do a lot of the same, ask Phil does this mean he would recommend using the knife in this manner - or would this steel be a good choice for that type of use. The reason I have done it with no problems was that I have done it many times before and knew how to load the edge with minimal twisting and I knew the failure point of the knife having broke and damaged many others so could readily benchmark the necessary critical points [I also was very gentle around the tip as it has an extreme distal taper]. Care was also taken to very closely inspect all wood to insure the inclusion probability is very low (knobs around here sometimes spike wood). I am confident I could do this with the Mel Sorg D2 blade I have as well, though the edge is so thin I doubt it would get through knots (3/32", convex grind, no secondary edge bevel, edge is <10 included).
Outside of experience however, for practical purposes both knives are readily exceeded for that task by something like the Howling Rat or even Mora 2000. Both knives with are far cheaper (especially the Mora) and can take far more forceful batoning with far less skill - which can be of severe importance in many situations such as high stress, very cold (dexterity drops off), injury, loaning the knife (due to previous conditions), etc. .
I will say that D2, when properly ground and heat treated, is more than good enough for the task of baton work.
When properly ground you can use any steel for any task if you define properly ground to satify that requirement - circular logic. It is how it fares in the other areas that are critical - what does it give up for its gains. D2 is optomized for wear resistance, it makes little effort to have decent levels of ductility, impact toughness or machinability (it is *very* low in all three and corrosion resistance as well but that doesn't matter here). Those latter three properties are what is needed for that type of wood working knife, the first property is of no consequence due to the very low rate of wear on knife edges for that class of cutting. So D2 is highest in the property that does not matter and ignores the ones that do and thus it is the worst possible steel to use.
To clarify, it would more correct to say among the worst, M2 would also be of similar stature as would the other steels of such properties. There are also steels which would be even worse such as T15 or the high CPM REX steels, but these are not commonly used for knifemaking. Of course any of the really hard steels would not be a good choice here as well, past 62 HRC and edge brittleness would probably be a factor and the edge would need to have to thicken to reduce damage and then of course you give up cutting ability. A commonly known downside of Japanese chisels, see Lee's book on sharpening for example.
In fact, the D2 Dozier fared better in this test than a similarly ground 52100 Marbles. The Marbles knife chipped. The Dozier had no damage. If D2 is that much worse than 52100 for baton work, in seems that the steel type is a much smaller factor in a knife s suitability for baton work than maybe heat treatment and proper grinding.
Marbles has had problems with their heat treating reported on the forums in the past, specifically one of their heavier chopping blades completly being destroyed simply chopping through a piece of wood - the edge completely destructed. Of course a flawed piece of steel can perform horribly so yes when buying one get a knife with a decent standard of QC and in any case evaluate it fully before it needs to be depended upon. But yes, if you ground 52100 (L6, 5160 etc.) horribly unsuitable for batoning (thin hollow grind, acute edge) [or any other task] then it would fare badly same as if there were flaws in the steel or heat treatment. This of course doesn't change the fact that its inherent set of properties are ideally suited for the task.
In short, geometry defines cutting ability, heat treatment defines the ability of the steel and the composition [steel type] defines the absolute limits on those abilities. Similar to athletic performance in people, genetics defies your optimal performance (steel composition), training develops it (heat treating), and skill gives birth to function (geometry). A combination of all three is necessary for a superior athlete or knife. Just like coaches will pick athletes for potential which will be developed, you pick steels based on what they are designed to do. Of course you don't blame the steel if you don't take advantage of its abilities.
-Cliff