- Joined
- Feb 25, 2006
- Messages
- 108
The answer to this question is probably going to boil down to personal preference but I'm going to ask anyway.
After reading numerous posts about how great the locking blade Victorinox knives are, I have been thinking about buying a forester or trekker (not the one hand mods.) and was wondering if there really is any advantage to them over my Vic Farmer or soldier. Yes the blade and saw are longer, the grip is bigger and the blade does lock. But after looking at one it doesn't seem quite as solid to me as my farmers and Soldiers.
I know alot of you swear by the lock blade Vics. but I have also seen alot of the Farmer and Soldier models shown in kit pictures.
Has anyone had the oppertunity to abuse either or both to see how they compare. Ive been using farmers and soldiers for years and they are rock solid but I have no first hand experience with the locklng blade models.
It seems to me that the Alox handels being pinned on make the the smaller knives more solid.
A penny for your 2 cents
After reading numerous posts about how great the locking blade Victorinox knives are, I have been thinking about buying a forester or trekker (not the one hand mods.) and was wondering if there really is any advantage to them over my Vic Farmer or soldier. Yes the blade and saw are longer, the grip is bigger and the blade does lock. But after looking at one it doesn't seem quite as solid to me as my farmers and Soldiers.
I know alot of you swear by the lock blade Vics. but I have also seen alot of the Farmer and Soldier models shown in kit pictures.
Has anyone had the oppertunity to abuse either or both to see how they compare. Ive been using farmers and soldiers for years and they are rock solid but I have no first hand experience with the locklng blade models.
It seems to me that the Alox handels being pinned on make the the smaller knives more solid.
A penny for your 2 cents