- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 13,363
This may be an uncomfortable subject for some, however very important in my opinion considering the number of knife photos posted here by makers and collectors each week.
Many collectors and especially makers post photos seeking opinions on their knives from members.
IMO, makers and collectors open themselves up to scrutiny in posting photos of their knives and should expect and accept it whether positive or negative.
Some here are skilled at critiquing and giving honest, constructive and non combative feedback for even the most horrific example of a knife. Others are painfully direct and insensitive with their criticism and opinions, and it seems theres one or two among us that have never seen a knife that didnt deserve praise.
I post photos of my knives mainly for two reasons; one to create interest and to possibly make a market for the piece in case or for when I decide to sell and second to get opinions and to identify and perhaps learn from my mistakes on knives where I participated in the design. I do hope forum members demonstrate a little tack and compassion in communicating their negative opinions, however I do accept and consider them no matter how presented.
When I first starting participating here I was told by a prominent collector, that we dont generally criticize collectors knives here but its OK to criticize makers knives as its part of their learning experience.
I guess theres some merit to this philosophy in that makers should welcome being made aware of defects in light of trying to not repeat mistakes. However IMO collectors, (especially new collectors) need to be made aware of defects too as part of their knife education and possibly benefit from experienced collectors pointing out defects which novice collectors may want to address with the makers when posting their new knife.
I believe we all enjoy viewing the beautiful knives shared here, but find it interesting that some makers and collectors never post photos of their knives, while others seem to post every one.
So why do you post, or not post photos of your knives?
Do some makers consider posting their knives risky with more to lose than gain?
Do makers in fact benefit or suffer from the close observation of their knives and opinions formed from their photos being posted on this forum?
At times collectors may get too caught up in the excitement or too involved in the makers creation of the knife and develop an allusion that the knife is more than it actually is. Do they benefit from getting unbiased opinion here even if it lessens their appreciation of the knife?
Is it correct to assume that if a maker or collector accepts and relishes the praise and positive posts that he/she should also take the critical post in good spirits too?
If you dont care for a particular knife or see defects, is it better to post your opinion or just keep it to yourself?
Any other thoughts or views on the subject??
Many collectors and especially makers post photos seeking opinions on their knives from members.
IMO, makers and collectors open themselves up to scrutiny in posting photos of their knives and should expect and accept it whether positive or negative.
Some here are skilled at critiquing and giving honest, constructive and non combative feedback for even the most horrific example of a knife. Others are painfully direct and insensitive with their criticism and opinions, and it seems theres one or two among us that have never seen a knife that didnt deserve praise.
I post photos of my knives mainly for two reasons; one to create interest and to possibly make a market for the piece in case or for when I decide to sell and second to get opinions and to identify and perhaps learn from my mistakes on knives where I participated in the design. I do hope forum members demonstrate a little tack and compassion in communicating their negative opinions, however I do accept and consider them no matter how presented.
When I first starting participating here I was told by a prominent collector, that we dont generally criticize collectors knives here but its OK to criticize makers knives as its part of their learning experience.
I guess theres some merit to this philosophy in that makers should welcome being made aware of defects in light of trying to not repeat mistakes. However IMO collectors, (especially new collectors) need to be made aware of defects too as part of their knife education and possibly benefit from experienced collectors pointing out defects which novice collectors may want to address with the makers when posting their new knife.
I believe we all enjoy viewing the beautiful knives shared here, but find it interesting that some makers and collectors never post photos of their knives, while others seem to post every one.
So why do you post, or not post photos of your knives?
Do some makers consider posting their knives risky with more to lose than gain?
Do makers in fact benefit or suffer from the close observation of their knives and opinions formed from their photos being posted on this forum?
At times collectors may get too caught up in the excitement or too involved in the makers creation of the knife and develop an allusion that the knife is more than it actually is. Do they benefit from getting unbiased opinion here even if it lessens their appreciation of the knife?
Is it correct to assume that if a maker or collector accepts and relishes the praise and positive posts that he/she should also take the critical post in good spirits too?
If you dont care for a particular knife or see defects, is it better to post your opinion or just keep it to yourself?
Any other thoughts or views on the subject??