Cliff Stamp
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 5, 1998
- Messages
- 17,562
I added a bunch of new work to the reviews, and have started referencing the Mora 2000 as a chopping blade for the small knives and folders rather than the GB hatchet. The Endura review :
http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/endura_pe.html
The Delica, which I hyperlinked, which I am still not sure of, but makes it easier to pop around :
http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/delica_pe.html
and the SpyderEdge Delica :
http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/delica_se.html
which is mainly a comparison of how the SpyderEdge works vs a fine/medium finish on a fairly broad scope of materials, including some links to other work done on other folders and Joe's FAQ's.
The reviews tend to repeat somewhat and the cross referencing is a little messy now, I think I am going to put up some separate pages on various aspects and then link to them directly and then add case specific info for each knife.
These will be going out for a pass around shortly. They have been slightly altered with a modification of the primary grind, basically I lowered it to thin the edge and then played with bleeding it back into the flats on a flat stone.
I only did half of each blade so the origional profile is intact for comparison. The Endura looks decent, the Delica looks like it was cut by a retarded monkey mainly because I didn't have a fresh belt and had to stop after roughly shaping the grind because it is very difficult to not burn tips.
In any case, while the grind looks bad, it will show the difference between the edge thickness in regards to cutting ability and ease of resharpening. I did the choil area on the Endura and the tip on the Delica. They were hand honed by one of my nephews and they came out decent, about half of optimal sharpness which is a lot better than I could do at his age.
Passaround thread :
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=381005
-Cliff
http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/endura_pe.html
The Delica, which I hyperlinked, which I am still not sure of, but makes it easier to pop around :
http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/delica_pe.html
and the SpyderEdge Delica :
http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/delica_se.html
which is mainly a comparison of how the SpyderEdge works vs a fine/medium finish on a fairly broad scope of materials, including some links to other work done on other folders and Joe's FAQ's.
The reviews tend to repeat somewhat and the cross referencing is a little messy now, I think I am going to put up some separate pages on various aspects and then link to them directly and then add case specific info for each knife.
These will be going out for a pass around shortly. They have been slightly altered with a modification of the primary grind, basically I lowered it to thin the edge and then played with bleeding it back into the flats on a flat stone.
I only did half of each blade so the origional profile is intact for comparison. The Endura looks decent, the Delica looks like it was cut by a retarded monkey mainly because I didn't have a fresh belt and had to stop after roughly shaping the grind because it is very difficult to not burn tips.
In any case, while the grind looks bad, it will show the difference between the edge thickness in regards to cutting ability and ease of resharpening. I did the choil area on the Endura and the tip on the Delica. They were hand honed by one of my nephews and they came out decent, about half of optimal sharpness which is a lot better than I could do at his age.
Passaround thread :
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=381005
-Cliff