Fox Exagon

Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
139
It's 85$ list price, I'm not sure how much cheaper it is other places, but does anyone else think that's a lot for a single throwing knife? I mean I personally like having more than one so I don't have to go and grab it every time it leaves my hand.
 
Are you sure that it's a throwing knife? I have 2, pretty decent knives, 440B steel, cord wrapped, sharp tips. Of course, you can throw them, but I don't think that are made specially for throwing.
 
This one specifically: ... The blade is a shape that makes it kind of useless for anything but stabbing and throwing.

The same could be said for all the knives in the Exagon line. There is no evidence of any of them being made of a "throwing knife" steel. "Throwing" in this case is just a sales hook.
 
The same could be said for all the knives in the Exagon line. There is no evidence of any of them being made of a "throwing knife" steel. "Throwing" in this case is just a sales hook.
But you wouldn't buy that blade shape expecting to use it as a utility knife.
 
Neither of those are the same as the Exagon throwing model though... It's a slightly rounded triangular blade. Almost like a dagger.

So it has some belly then.

It's no more or less "utility" or "throwing" than any of the blades in the series. They just made a series of blades of different shapes and gave them names like "Utility," "Small Attack," "Throwing," "Military," etc. The "throwing" part of its name is meaningless.

Is a blade with no belly my choice for general utility? No. Do tons of people use blades with no bellies like wharncliffes, tantos, sheepsfoots for utility? Yes.
 
I think I would be more inclined to use that knife in a non-throwing role. However, I don't know what the hardness (Rockwell C scale) is, but I want to think that knives made for throwing rank several points below a knife meant to hold a good cutting edge. In other words throwing knives are "softer" so that they will not break as easy when hitting a solid object such as a rock, not that the rock is the intended target.

Boker Magnum makes a set of throwing knives, as does Browning, Cold Steel, Condor, and United Cutlery makes some Gil Hibbern designed throwers. Any of these can be had for under $50.
 
I think I would be more inclined to use that knife in a non-throwing role. However, I don't know what the hardness (Rockwell C scale) is, but I want to think that knives made for throwing rank several points below a knife meant to hold a good cutting edge. In other words throwing knives are "softer" so that they will not break as easy when hitting a solid object such as a rock, not that the rock is the intended target.

Boker Magnum makes a set of throwing knives, as does Browning, Cold Steel, Condor, and United Cutlery makes some Gil Hibbern designed throwers. Any of these can be had for under $50.
Yeah, I've seen how cheap ones shatter or snap. I still don't see why you'd buy that blade shape when you have other, more useful ones to choose from.
 
Oh I wouldn't buy the knife as I have no use for it, but if I "had" it and did use it, I think it would make a good small utility knife, though there are better blade shapes to fit that role. If this is meant to be a throwing knife you may be able to email FoxUSA and get some more info about it, such as hardness, and is it designed to be a thrower or is that just the name of it, though it would make a funny name especially if it is not a thrower.
 
I still don't see why you'd buy that blade shape when you have other, more useful ones to choose from.

Because, by calling it "Thrower", people believe its a special, dedicated throwing knife. Just as people believe the "Military" model in that line is made specially for high speed operators.

It's not a thrower. Throwers are made of tougher, softer steels than ordinary knives. Throwers don't really need sharpened edges.

"Thrower" is pure marketing/ninja bait in this case.
 
Back
Top