Frame locks are less likely to have a problem vs liner locks. They are inherantly more reliable particularly in white knuckle grips because you actually cause the lock to engage in further and prevent it from moving to disengage.
The only fault I have found in frame lock designs is in the lock relief. I've seen countless knives in my shop and it makes absolutely no sense to me to have a knife with a lock .150 thick, 0125, or .100 thick only to see the relief where they make the lock bend machined down to thinner than even a weaker liner lock folder would be at its thinnest point. For one thing you can find evidince that very nice liner locking folders are being made with .065 and .070 thick locks that are bent with no relief whatsoever in them and these are easy enough to push to release as is with no great effort or thumb wear or the need for a lock stablizer to keep from overextending the lock and rebending it out the other way, athough there is nothing at all wrong with this stabalizer idea. Even the thick locks can be rebent so its actually a good one that other makers should adopt with frame lock folders IMO, since they don't have that liner or handle scale behind it to keep it from going too far the other way when its released.
For me these are reasons enough to simply never have to take a lock relief down to some of the sub .040 thinneses I have measured on what are otherwise massive heavy duty knives. To me that is the weakest link in the chain and the inevitable fail point or fold and defeat point to watch out for on any frame locking folder. In my own testing to failure this is indeed where they folded in and defeated under extreme pressure.
If I can literally push the lock on a frame lock downward when it is engaging the blade and with very little effort at that, I simply won't have it in my EDC routine. Case closed. If you already have one of this type, hopefully its one with a great warranty. Most of these companies do cover their work so if there is a plus to this area for improvement thats it I guess.
I will spare you the list on this public forum for some of the so called heavier duty frame locking tactical folders I have seen this weak point on. Most of that crowd doesn't want to hear it or admit there is room for improvement on one of their proven knives anyway, and thats fine.
I just call it like I see it from the stand point of knowing knives inside and out and what I say is not personal or directed at anyone maker. Its just my own observation. Take it for what its worth but don't read it as me saying I don't like liner or frame locks. I am just very picky as to the ones I own but I love frame locks and its my most owned lock type folder. For what its worth, I walk the talk with these folders and make them myself, and some I've done have been tested to failure so my opinions are not based on anything but facts as I see them from my own tests and from those I've discussed with others that make them, as well as comments from Sal Glesser on the test results he has seen on the ones they have tested at Spyderco.
I make a pretty good bit of spare change improving knives for folks and like to think I have a pretty good grasp of things to know what can or cannot improve a folder and what works or doesn't work but admit readily I am no where near knowing it all. When I'm wrong I admit it and apologize if I was. I just think I'm right here on this issue and thats all I'm saying about it. There has been a great deal of discussion here about liner and frame locking folders which is enough to warn anyone to watch out for weak spots. Some say the whole locking system is weak no matter and I do not agree with that at all.
If you disagree with me, please no more nasty PMs telling me so or calling me a integral lock hater. I've probably heard it already anyways and my inbox is too full most of the time now.
STR