FRN vs SS

Thomas J Ekman

Thomas J Ekman

Joined
Jul 29, 2000
Messages
555
I just go the Spyderco Harpy today. I already have the Merlin, so I wonder if the stainless steel Harpy will be more durable for heavy work, such as slashing, cutting ropes etc, just because it is made entirely of steel, or is it just the internal mechanisms that count?
 
Theoretically the stainless is supposed to be a bit stronger, if nothing else it feels that way.
 
"I wonder if the stainless steel Harpy will be more durable for heavy work,..."

Technically, yes, SS will be more durable as far as brute force is considered. Then again, whatever you are doing to break or weaken the FRN handle of a knife, you're probably not using it appropriately as a fine cutting tool--but as something else like a blunt instrument.


"...or is it just the internal mechanisms that count?"

Yes, if you are using your knife appropriately (no prying, chopping, hammer pounding, etc.). FRN in Spyderco form has the advantage of being grippy and extremely lightweight while it is also extremely durable and impervious to adverse elements. I can testify to that. HTH

P.S.
Welcome to the Harpy Club.
I recently acquired the Harpy with G10 scales, a discontinued model unfortunately. With this one I found the perfect answer to the FRN vs SS dilemma. G10 has the 'grippiness' of FRN and the similar heft/solidity of stainless steel, IMO.
Check one out and you'll see.
 
The SS handle are heavy and slippery. Some holes or cut outs would lighten them up and give a better grip.

Paul
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top