G-10 vs. FRN Native question

Joined
Apr 2, 2000
Messages
8
Merry Christmas to all!

I'm looking to buy a Native, probably the serrated model, and I've really been impressed by the pictures I've seen of the G-10 models with pearl inlay. I anticipate whichever I buy would be my new daily carry , and I'm wondering if the extra cost for the G-10 model is justified in terms of performance. I'd love to hear opinions from all of you who have handled both versions.

(I already know the Native is one of the darlings of the forum, so you don't need to convince me of the merits of this model again!.
smile.gif


Thanks in advance - Colquhoun
 
I'm also interested in the Native but I would like one with a G-10 handle without the inlays.I just don't care for Zytel. Is such a model available?
 
Merry Christmas to you too, Colquhoun
wink.gif


For daily carry purposes, the price difference between the FRN Native and the G-10 version is certainly not justified.

The FRN Native is a great model. It sports a CPM 440V blade, just like the G-10 model, for a ridiculously low price (most CPM 440V knives out there cost $100+!). It is lighter, making it a more comfortable carry (although the G-10 model is heavier, it is not an uncomfortable carry). The handle doesn't feel cheap in my hands, and it sports a really cool looking Spydie-web pattern that also aids in providing traction, thus eliminating slippery conditions.

You've probably heard about the advantages of G-10. Even better traction control, more solid-looking, solid feel, etc. However, G-10 Natives were designed as collectors pieces, and although they would work great as daily carry, the price difference is quite substantial to make you think twice about carrying a limited edition model. For example, how would you feel if during hard-use, or if you dropped the knife, the tip would break or the blade scratches heavily? If you bought the FRN version, which is very reasonably priced at around $43, you wouldn't care as much. If you bought the $132 G-10 version, you'd probably feel pretty bummed. I know I would.

Bottom line is: G-10 versions were designed as collectors pieces, FRN as daily-carry hard-use knives. I am such a big fan of the Native, that I decided to buy TWO BF Blue G-10 versions, one for collecting and one for daily carry (both with replacement silver clips), TWO black G-10 shell inlay Natives, again one for collecting and one for daily carry, and ONE FRN Native, to which I show no mercy. If I had to make your decision, I would go for the FRN Native without even pausing to think. In conclusion, both function just as well, so for daily carry and beating-up purposes, the FRN Native is the best choice hands down.

As for Sammie: The only other G-10 Native model out there is the BF (Bladeforums) Native with a BLUE G-10 handle. It is a limited-run collectors piece made not too long ago, only 500 made (250 plain and 250 serrated). You must post in the "Knives Wanted To Buy" section to have a chance at getting one. That's how I got mine. They are NOT cheap (around $125).

Good luck to you both! You've both chosen a heck of a knife.

-Flood
 
What's the difference in steel? The BF Blue G-10 is CPM440V I think. That's certainly a step up from the production models.

------------------
"Never give a sword to a man who can't dance" (Celtic Proverb)
AKTI# A000107
 
No difference in steel between the Blue G-10 BF model, the Black G-10 shell inlay model, and the FRN model. All are CPM440V.

The only difference in steel is found in the Steel handle Native. That blade is AUS-10.

-Flood
 
Thx Flood- I thought the FRN/Zytel models were outfitted with some steel from the AUS family. I haven't had my hands on one in a while.
Regards-
Mike

------------------
"Never give a sword to a man who can't dance" (Celtic Proverb)
AKTI# A000107
 
Back
Top