- Joined
- Apr 28, 2012
- Messages
- 255
After looking at the GB2 Prototype pics :thumbup: and FriarPhenns awesome GB photos in the "Which Spyderco are you carrying today?" thread :thumbup:, I picked up my own GB and did a little comparing. One thing I noticed between mine and Friar's is that the transition between his flats and hollow grind is straighter and higher than on mine.
Here's some pics of mine (I don't want to repost his pics without his permission, maybe he'll chime in):
To my eyes: On the 'Texas side' the line is pretty straight with just a slight dip about 1/8"-1/4" before the swedge starts. On the 'Bug side' there's a relative rise from the hilt to the swedge, with an ever-so-slight waviness to boot.
Obviously, the moral to this story is 'If you're a recovering perfectionist (like me), don't compare your knife to other's'.
Truth be told though, this is such a spectacular blade for the money and also a knife with relative high production numbers, I'm sure... so I don't care about slight imperfection(s). I just wanted to see the variations other GB owners have and their thoughts about them. Also, if anyone could chime in about how the hollow grinding process goes, more specifically: Is there more to the variances than simply the 'human element'?...that'd be great insight for me, perhaps others too.
Here's some pics of mine (I don't want to repost his pics without his permission, maybe he'll chime in):


To my eyes: On the 'Texas side' the line is pretty straight with just a slight dip about 1/8"-1/4" before the swedge starts. On the 'Bug side' there's a relative rise from the hilt to the swedge, with an ever-so-slight waviness to boot.
Obviously, the moral to this story is 'If you're a recovering perfectionist (like me), don't compare your knife to other's'.
