:
I only have the WW II blade with the Hanuman handle so I don't know if it would be a fair compareison between it and the G.S.
I do know the G.S. is continueing to grow on me though.I believe it does penetrate better than the 18"AK although it doesn't have the shear power the AK does.
I went and got them for a better compareison of the blades.The G.S. is 12 3/4" long and the WW II Hanuman S. is 11 3/4".The WW II H.S. is a tad wider at about 1 3/4" and is a full 1/16" thinner at 7/16" thick.
Uncle is close to what the fuller thickness is.I get about 0.230" and I know it's a tad less because I don't have the radius attachment on my mic's.I do have to say the Kamis are better with feel and eye than some guys here are with a 1/4 million dollar machine.
Hmmm.Now that's a surprise.I mic'ed the top of the bevels at the sweet spot on both knives and the WW II H.S. is about 0.025" thinner at 0.225.Maybe it's the deep fuller that makes it appear to me that way.
I know it's a kind of lame compareison,but for what it's worth I would pick the G.S. over the Hanuman with the WW blade.Somehow it feels better balanced and more lively.There is only an inch difference between the length and the c/g is about the same.
That's my .02ç
------------------
>>>>---¥vsa---->®
Cornbread ain't s'possed ta be sweet!....Dagnabit gurl,whut did they teach you way up north in ....
hehehe.
[This message has been edited by Yvsa (edited 12 October 1999).]