Same here. The Prodigy is almost perfect for a medium size beater type knife you wouldn't cry over if lost. I don't mind the serrations if used as a dive knife but for most other uses - no need for them.
These days Gerber gets close at times but always seems to miss the mark. The Mark II should have a wasp waist blade with or without serrations. I don't mind the mediocre steel because it’s a stabbing blade. BUT, most of us like the Mark II for the "look" and history. Why not do both? Make it "cool looking" (read historically accurate) and functional. Throw in a QUALITY leather sheath as well. The ones they are selling for the Anniversary Mark II are pathetic.
Anyone remember the Cutlery Shoppe versions? With serrations, without serrations, with canted blade, without canted blade. Gray cats tongue handle, original width blade etc. Watch how much they go for on the BAY. Huge amounts of money for a collector piece. Why? Because thats the style buyers REALLY want.They are not Vietnam era blades but demand a premium. Obviously it can be done and has been done but the powers to be at Gerber have unfortunately gone the way of other manufacturers. Go cheap, go oversees, come close but let the dwindling fan base continue to melt away. Can they do it? Yup! Will they do it? NO.
I know, I know the standard line of defense for Gerber, you have to understand the knife industry. We are a small group here on Bladeforums. Gerber sells huge amounts of knives without us blah blah blah. Thats not the point in this rant. What bugs me so much is how some manufacturers listen to their customers (Kabar, Becker, ESEE, Bark River, etc) while Gerber turns a deaf ear. It could be easily done without killing their profits but there just isn't any interest. While I'm at it, has anyone noticed the newly designed and overpriced Mark 1? NO you say? Exactly.
Rant over. I feel better now.