- Joined
- Jun 5, 2002
- Messages
- 2,761
OK. Like a lot of people, most of the handmade knives i own are not true customs, because i bought them already made, from websites such as Knife-Art and the like, or at shows from makers. So, yes, i know, these are merely handmade knives, not true customs, since they werent made to my specifications. Here is what i wonder.
Isnt there something to be said for letting the maker make the knife according to his own vision, isnt it likely his artistic vision for a knife is probably better than mine? Isnt it probable that if the knife is envisioned and designed by me, that it may not be as nice a knife as it would have been if the maker wasnt constrained by my design? After all, you wouldnt tell Picasso exactly what to paint, what colors to use, if you did, it wouldnt really be a picasso, in my case, it would be an "Ari", and probably not nearly as aesthetic as what the maker would have created if left alone with his own vision.
I see so many hand made knives that i think are truly perfect creations, in my wildest dreams i couldnt have designed it better and thus, the finished knife is better for not having my specifications thrust upon it.
I bought a Corbit dagger recently, i look at the knife and marvel at how perfect it is and there is not one single thing i would want to change, which means had i been the one to design it, it probably would not look as good as it does having been designed by Jerry himself, after all, isnt his expertise in what makes a knife look good superior to mine, im not a knife maker or designer. He knows better than i what looks good and what works.
So, what do you guys think, is there something to be said for these handmade knives that while not being customs in the true sense of the word, are better reflections of the particular style and artistic vision of the artist who designed and made them? If i tell Jerry Corbit what to make, isnt it no longer a Corbit, and hasnt something important been lost?
Isnt there something to be said for letting the maker make the knife according to his own vision, isnt it likely his artistic vision for a knife is probably better than mine? Isnt it probable that if the knife is envisioned and designed by me, that it may not be as nice a knife as it would have been if the maker wasnt constrained by my design? After all, you wouldnt tell Picasso exactly what to paint, what colors to use, if you did, it wouldnt really be a picasso, in my case, it would be an "Ari", and probably not nearly as aesthetic as what the maker would have created if left alone with his own vision.
I see so many hand made knives that i think are truly perfect creations, in my wildest dreams i couldnt have designed it better and thus, the finished knife is better for not having my specifications thrust upon it.
I bought a Corbit dagger recently, i look at the knife and marvel at how perfect it is and there is not one single thing i would want to change, which means had i been the one to design it, it probably would not look as good as it does having been designed by Jerry himself, after all, isnt his expertise in what makes a knife look good superior to mine, im not a knife maker or designer. He knows better than i what looks good and what works.
So, what do you guys think, is there something to be said for these handmade knives that while not being customs in the true sense of the word, are better reflections of the particular style and artistic vision of the artist who designed and made them? If i tell Jerry Corbit what to make, isnt it no longer a Corbit, and hasnt something important been lost?