Interesting (and long) read. I appreciate its opinions and the SEM scans are great but I also know you have to be cautious telling people their long used method, which produces a more than razor sharp edge, is wrong. There are many alternate methods of getting a blade extremely sharp and well refined while arriving there very differently, to say someone's method which they have practiced and refined over years "isn't as good as the" think" probably won't bode well. I'm always open to learn new things, but that doesn't necessarily mean my current way of doing it is wrong, or not as good as any other...
I have to wonder why it has two sections on specific products while the other sections are more generic, on "stones" and "steels" (yes they do state the exact stone being used, but it just seems weird the two specific systems have their own sections while the rest of the testing is done more blindly. I see its from a prof. at Iowa State (reputable I'm sure) but I have to wonder who, or what company funded this research / experimenting / report / advertising.