I received my Chiruwa 16.5-inch AK, and I want to thank Uncle for the speedy service.
Here are my initial impressions. It really is a beautiful knife. The initials on the blade are L.B. with a half-moon. Is that Bura? One of the best kamis? Kool! Correct me if I'm wrong.
However, I have a concern. The HI website advertises the Chiruwa as a blade that measures out at a massive 1/2-inch in thickness. But, the one I received is no wider than my other 15-inch AK's--which all measure 3/8-inch thick.
Overall, I think I expected a "heavier and beefier" knife--a chopping monster that somewhat dwarfs my 15-inch AK's--not in length, but in weight. I am not sure yet if I'm dissapointed or not, because if it were too heavy, I might not enjoy lugging it around the woods.
Anyway, I wonder if the HI website deserves a change in description. Instead of advertising the Chiruwa as a 1/2-inch thick blade, maybe it should say 3/8-inch.
Thoughts?
Here are my initial impressions. It really is a beautiful knife. The initials on the blade are L.B. with a half-moon. Is that Bura? One of the best kamis? Kool! Correct me if I'm wrong.
However, I have a concern. The HI website advertises the Chiruwa as a blade that measures out at a massive 1/2-inch in thickness. But, the one I received is no wider than my other 15-inch AK's--which all measure 3/8-inch thick.
Overall, I think I expected a "heavier and beefier" knife--a chopping monster that somewhat dwarfs my 15-inch AK's--not in length, but in weight. I am not sure yet if I'm dissapointed or not, because if it were too heavy, I might not enjoy lugging it around the woods.
Anyway, I wonder if the HI website deserves a change in description. Instead of advertising the Chiruwa as a 1/2-inch thick blade, maybe it should say 3/8-inch.
Thoughts?