Temperline (TL) is a transition between the hard and soft steels. when done properly it yields a soft spine and ricasso,hard edge, great break resistance/lamination on larger knives swords etc. In smaller knives I will say its decorative.
Having a TL can be good like I mentioned before or it can hinder the functionality of a knife...Here is my issue:
I see many smiths who try to make Large wavy TL's on large knives that offer no functionality. Often these lines get VERY close to the cutting edge and after a few years of use you may have a soft spot on your blade. (Often seen on top clips and near the ricasso. True, who uses a top clip often?? It is still a fictional edge on a knife though just a bit less functional)
I also see the TL way to close to the edge on large knives. If you really start using the knife hard will it be bendy like a machete? will it grind through in a few years of use and develop a soft spot?
My biggest issue is when a smith lets the TL cross a cutting edge. I see this on topclips all the time. OR the TL ends in a very bad spot like a stress point.
My question is this: There are many prominent smiths who make these 'mistakes' yet they are praised for beautiful functional knives. They may or may not have designations. At the end of the day if a knife has a obvious TL issue which may or may not cause functionality issues down the road, why the heck do people still buy it/praise it? If I had a chance to get a knife from a great maker at a LOW price that had one of these issues I would pass on it. And I have passed on it a few times... Am I the only one?
Having a TL can be good like I mentioned before or it can hinder the functionality of a knife...Here is my issue:
I see many smiths who try to make Large wavy TL's on large knives that offer no functionality. Often these lines get VERY close to the cutting edge and after a few years of use you may have a soft spot on your blade. (Often seen on top clips and near the ricasso. True, who uses a top clip often?? It is still a fictional edge on a knife though just a bit less functional)
I also see the TL way to close to the edge on large knives. If you really start using the knife hard will it be bendy like a machete? will it grind through in a few years of use and develop a soft spot?
My biggest issue is when a smith lets the TL cross a cutting edge. I see this on topclips all the time. OR the TL ends in a very bad spot like a stress point.
My question is this: There are many prominent smiths who make these 'mistakes' yet they are praised for beautiful functional knives. They may or may not have designations. At the end of the day if a knife has a obvious TL issue which may or may not cause functionality issues down the road, why the heck do people still buy it/praise it? If I had a chance to get a knife from a great maker at a LOW price that had one of these issues I would pass on it. And I have passed on it a few times... Am I the only one?