Handle length of Graham Razels

[woodgood]

The length of the handle for most of the Graham Razel models seem to be around 3.5". Isn't this rather short? Do they make one that has a larger handle? I know the ringed versions are a little longer but that hole in the handle doesn't add room for more fingers, etc.

I wear a large glove and I guess my hands are kinda large but not too large.

A sub 4" handle on most knives is just a little tight for me I guess.

I really like the looks of the Graham knives but I haven't had the chance to hold one in my hand to see for myself.

I thought others might be willing to share their opinions.

Thanks,

Brett

 

[Buffalohump]

Personally I feel the knives are a little small, considering what they cost.

I bought a SS4 from them some time back and that is a decent handle size, but I couldn't get my head around the serrations on the spine so I traded it off.

Its very difficult to judge until you've held the knife but my feeling is they are a little small.

 

[myright]

Hey WG - I have a Graham Spearpoint, a stubby razel and sold off a ringed Razel. IMHO the handle on my spearpoint is pretty darn short. The ringed razel allows for the most control and grip, but if you don't like the ring it doesn't make a difference.

Great knives... expensive.. but great knives. Try the CRKT version if you are unsure. Also, if you get the extended tang versions it gives a little more length.