Ever since being introduced to reprofiling my knives by Cliff Stamp I've maintained that knives should be ground thin as long as they're being used by responsible people who understand how to properly use a knife.
Currently we see knives shipping from prominent manufacturers with edges thicker than many factory axes come with. While I disagree with their methodology, it's understandable in a sense considering what the "average" consumer would expect of their knives. However I still think leaving the edge irrationally thick has serious drawbacks, such as giving people the impression that the way X knife cuts from factory with a 40 degree inclusive edge is the way a knife should cut. It also gives people the idea that a knife is to be used forthings it shouldn't be. 3 inch bladed pocket knives make terrible pry bars and metal cutters, there are much better tools for the job. Small knives excel at cutting up food, slicing cardboard etc. Sure, you can design a knife that will be able to pry and be hammered through nails, but it will still be worse than a use designed tool, it will be terrible at common knife jobs and will cost more. I don't know anyone that regularly batons their folders for firewood or stabs through car hoods. The only time I would consider a 40 degree inclusive edge is if I were planning to use a knife solely for chopping through metal. Even my kuhkuris and large chopping axes are thinner than that at the edge, so why are pocket knives with 3 inch blades being kept this way by people knowledgeable enough about knives to sharpen them?
The thin edge has many benefits. If one utilizes microbevels it will decrease sharpening time tremendously. There are obvious benefits in the amount of force need to cut through media due to the thinner geometry, which results in less fatigue for the user and less stress put on the parts of a knife. It has been observed that there could be an increase in edge holding as well, though I have not tested this personally so will not claim it as fact.
I want to know what things you are doing with your pocket knife that makes you desire a 30 degree inclusive edge or greater. I want to know whether or not you've tried taking it down to 10 degrees per side, and if you have, why it wasn't strong enough for you.
In this video the Byrd Cara Cara I have posted for a pass around did light chopping ad was stabbed into a can of corn. The edge handled this fine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMpS-pKQlzI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW8bc7W3Qik
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SFG9-6Bmp0
Here are threads with photos of each knife: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5270406&postcount=1
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5487840&postcount=339
Note, the UKPK is ground even thinner since the photos were taken.
I've read the "What do you cut with your knives" threads and this use is not typical of the majority of users knife usage. It's much harsher. So why is it so rare to see knives ground at 10 degrees per side or less discuss here or posted in photo threads, when as I just demonstrated, they are more durable than what most people here have stated they need?
Taking this further, I do not understand why saber grinds are so popular.
Why pay for the latest super stainless steel and not even give it an edge to show it's true nature? Especially considering these high RC steels can take terribly thin edges.
I'm trying to understand the rational basis for these types of edges but so far have failed to find one?
If you re not convinced, send me a knife and I will regrind it for you myself at no charge so you can see what I'm talking about. (Certain conditions apply, e.g. I won't do recurves, one knife per member etc.)
Currently we see knives shipping from prominent manufacturers with edges thicker than many factory axes come with. While I disagree with their methodology, it's understandable in a sense considering what the "average" consumer would expect of their knives. However I still think leaving the edge irrationally thick has serious drawbacks, such as giving people the impression that the way X knife cuts from factory with a 40 degree inclusive edge is the way a knife should cut. It also gives people the idea that a knife is to be used forthings it shouldn't be. 3 inch bladed pocket knives make terrible pry bars and metal cutters, there are much better tools for the job. Small knives excel at cutting up food, slicing cardboard etc. Sure, you can design a knife that will be able to pry and be hammered through nails, but it will still be worse than a use designed tool, it will be terrible at common knife jobs and will cost more. I don't know anyone that regularly batons their folders for firewood or stabs through car hoods. The only time I would consider a 40 degree inclusive edge is if I were planning to use a knife solely for chopping through metal. Even my kuhkuris and large chopping axes are thinner than that at the edge, so why are pocket knives with 3 inch blades being kept this way by people knowledgeable enough about knives to sharpen them?
The thin edge has many benefits. If one utilizes microbevels it will decrease sharpening time tremendously. There are obvious benefits in the amount of force need to cut through media due to the thinner geometry, which results in less fatigue for the user and less stress put on the parts of a knife. It has been observed that there could be an increase in edge holding as well, though I have not tested this personally so will not claim it as fact.
I want to know what things you are doing with your pocket knife that makes you desire a 30 degree inclusive edge or greater. I want to know whether or not you've tried taking it down to 10 degrees per side, and if you have, why it wasn't strong enough for you.
In this video the Byrd Cara Cara I have posted for a pass around did light chopping ad was stabbed into a can of corn. The edge handled this fine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMpS-pKQlzI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW8bc7W3Qik
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SFG9-6Bmp0
Here are threads with photos of each knife: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5270406&postcount=1
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5487840&postcount=339
Note, the UKPK is ground even thinner since the photos were taken.
I've read the "What do you cut with your knives" threads and this use is not typical of the majority of users knife usage. It's much harsher. So why is it so rare to see knives ground at 10 degrees per side or less discuss here or posted in photo threads, when as I just demonstrated, they are more durable than what most people here have stated they need?
Taking this further, I do not understand why saber grinds are so popular.
Why pay for the latest super stainless steel and not even give it an edge to show it's true nature? Especially considering these high RC steels can take terribly thin edges.
I'm trying to understand the rational basis for these types of edges but so far have failed to find one?
If you re not convinced, send me a knife and I will regrind it for you myself at no charge so you can see what I'm talking about. (Certain conditions apply, e.g. I won't do recurves, one knife per member etc.)