- Joined
- Mar 10, 2000
- Messages
- 1,146
Hi All,
Got a question.
Recently got some CPM154 in 3/32" thickness.
Was recently talking with a fine maker I respect who is really "high" on CPM154.
He successfully attains 59-60 Rc by heating at 1950 F for 30 minutes and 2-2 hour draws at 400F....and no Cryogenic Chill.
Crucible doesn't have tech sheets on CPM154 online but does have tech sheets on 154CM which state that cryo is desireable BUT "Thin sections can be successfully quenched in forced air and will obtain results to those in the table above.
Is the thought that that the CPM process distirbutes the carbides so more evenly and the steel would perform so well without cryo freeze that cryo freeze espc on thinner pieces (like blades under .10") isn't required and aren't noticeably enhanced by cryo.
Thoughts are appreciated.
Thank-You
Got a question.
Recently got some CPM154 in 3/32" thickness.
Was recently talking with a fine maker I respect who is really "high" on CPM154.
He successfully attains 59-60 Rc by heating at 1950 F for 30 minutes and 2-2 hour draws at 400F....and no Cryogenic Chill.
Crucible doesn't have tech sheets on CPM154 online but does have tech sheets on 154CM which state that cryo is desireable BUT "Thin sections can be successfully quenched in forced air and will obtain results to those in the table above.
Is the thought that that the CPM process distirbutes the carbides so more evenly and the steel would perform so well without cryo freeze that cryo freeze espc on thinner pieces (like blades under .10") isn't required and aren't noticeably enhanced by cryo.
Thoughts are appreciated.
Thank-You