- Joined
- Jul 27, 2015
- Messages
- 4,666
I've been interested in a RAT-3 for a little while, as I love smaller fixed blade knives. I've never actually seen one in the flesh, so all I have to go by are internet reviews. Most reviews seem positive, but with the caveat that Ontario's heat treat is inconsistent, and you can get a blade that is so brittle it chips out if you look at it wrong, or one that is marshmallow soft.
Another fairly common criticism I've read is that scale-tang fit is not always perfect.
Since the group here seems to be more reliable and more up to day than random reviews scattered throughout the interwebz, figured I'd ask here. Was there a problem with the heat treatments at Ontario or is this all just internet rumor? If so, has the issue been rectified? Is this all just internet
Obviously there's the very very similar (for obvious reasons) ESEE-3 that gets flawless reviews and has the advantage of Rowen's near legendary heat treating. I have held an ESEE-3 and the fit/finish were impeccable too. But if the RAT-3 is basically the same thing but for 60% of the price, then it makes it awfully tempting.
So what say you?
Another fairly common criticism I've read is that scale-tang fit is not always perfect.
Since the group here seems to be more reliable and more up to day than random reviews scattered throughout the interwebz, figured I'd ask here. Was there a problem with the heat treatments at Ontario or is this all just internet rumor? If so, has the issue been rectified? Is this all just internet
Obviously there's the very very similar (for obvious reasons) ESEE-3 that gets flawless reviews and has the advantage of Rowen's near legendary heat treating. I have held an ESEE-3 and the fit/finish were impeccable too. But if the RAT-3 is basically the same thing but for 60% of the price, then it makes it awfully tempting.
So what say you?