Simonxm: therein lies the dilemma. It's not the perceived enhancement of the photos which determine quality, but, rather holding it in person. To that point I am in complete agreement.
ALL I can do is to bring a two dimensional image to the viewer. Let's face it, showing a poorly lit, blurry, or otherwise unflattering photograph does neither the maker and the viewer no good. Especially the maker.
You are not the first to bring up the point about potentially 'overflattering images'. There are two wincing comments which come to mind which I hear often:
"The photos don't do this piece justice." No matter how good the image LOOKS, the knife is
even better in hand.
"It looks like a drawing or unreal. I want to see what it REALLY looks like." This is where the viewer feels the piece is unfairly represented through enhancement.
In the end what the person wants is what YOU want:
I want to know how good it is beyond the 2D images.
Well, there we are. At an impasse on the
internet. Unless someone offers first-hand input, all I can do is present the maker's work in the most positive method on a screen. After all, THEY have paid me to do so. A
lesser quality image doesn't bring you closer to tactile impressions.
Long live actual Knife Shows!
To that end, I have handled extensively EVERY one of these makers and many more. All I can say is it's a matter of taste. Each one's build quality is among the highest of levels.
This said, go back and look at any photo, including MY extensively enhanced versions.

They won't disappoint. Not from Best, Steigerwalt, or Wood.
Smart points made by you. I understand
Good thread.