- Joined
- May 4, 2002
- Messages
- 2,536
I am sure this topic has been covered before, but I have no search function, if this a yawner, please forgive me. I would like if anyone could give more light to this.
All I recall on this, long ago someone said "Seb doesn't need one". 1. I can see where the locklug on a Seb will not "overbend"the other way. I have never had it happen to me.(this is not a knife you will carry to a fire and open/close with a gloved hand) 2. But... the other function(it is said) of the Sta. is to reduce or stop the lug from moving "towards the back of the knife handle when gripping it". As we all know, under heavy gripping, the lug will move over to the other scale slab. The back movement of the lug changes the position of contact of the lug to the blade. I tried this: Close knife, take thumb and index finger, gently squese lug doun toward back of handle.... it moves. Now think of the great force you apply when cutting say, wood??
Anyway, this Sta. looks good on paper. Can anyone give another view of this?
All I recall on this, long ago someone said "Seb doesn't need one". 1. I can see where the locklug on a Seb will not "overbend"the other way. I have never had it happen to me.(this is not a knife you will carry to a fire and open/close with a gloved hand) 2. But... the other function(it is said) of the Sta. is to reduce or stop the lug from moving "towards the back of the knife handle when gripping it". As we all know, under heavy gripping, the lug will move over to the other scale slab. The back movement of the lug changes the position of contact of the lug to the blade. I tried this: Close knife, take thumb and index finger, gently squese lug doun toward back of handle.... it moves. Now think of the great force you apply when cutting say, wood??
Anyway, this Sta. looks good on paper. Can anyone give another view of this?