Historic Hebrew swords and knives

Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
3
Hello folks,

Great website. Just started making my own blades this year, and wish I had found this website earlier!

I would like to make a historically acturate replica of swords used during King David's time by the Hebrew army. Anyone have any drawings that could help?

Thanks in advance! Regards from Western NC.
 
Check out Amnon Ben-Tor, The Archaeology of Ancient Israel (Yale, 1992), and Sariel Shalev, Swords and Daggers in Late Bronze Age Canaan (Franz Steiner Verlag, 2004).

These will cover Bronze and Iron Ages, and will have pictures and descriptions of what we have dug up--only a fraction, unfortunately, of what existed. The diverse styles of weapons found in ancient Canaan (Egyptian, Philistine, Israelite, etc.) is quite interesting.

Google Books is your friend:
http://books.google.com/books?id=m1...&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result

http://books.google.com/books?id=Ep...&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result
 
The only prob might be that there is some discussion amongst academics as to the dating of the reigns of David and Solomon. Tradtionally, the way that they were dated was by lining them up with the Egyptian dynasty dating, which would place the reign of Solomon in the early Iron Age period. However, new reasearch has indicated that the Hebrew Kingdom under Solomon was possibly late Bronze Age. The confusion iscaused by the relatively new theory that two of the Egyptian dynasties may have somehow ruled concurrently and thus would cause you to have to move everything back a century of two. One only has to look at Celtic swords to see how different a late Bronze Age weapon can look from on from the Iron Age.
 
The military weapons of those times went through constant cycles, in which one army would favor one weapon, and the opposing army would develop a weapon to counter the first army's weapon.

For many centuries, then, the same weapons would appear and reappear as the fashions of the times.

Large nations, which customarily indulged in warfare as a practice of obtaining material wealth, land, and free labor forces, would maintain large armies, including cavalries and chariot forces.

The armies of these large nations, such as Egypt, would have relatively standardized and sophisticated weapons and armor.

Their soldiers would wear uniforms, carry uniform weapons and armor, and would have uniform training and tactics.

This would enable armorers, or blacksmiths, to make numbers of weapons on a larger more efficient scale, according to a uniform pattern.

Therefore, one sees the complex sickle sword amongst the Egyptians, but probably not amongst the soldiers of smaller nations.

Small nations, such as Israel, did not maintain large armies.

The rulers of these nations might retain a small corps of professionals, who would have sophisticated weapons and armor.

By sophisticated, I mean perhaps a sickle sword (double-edged, counter to the opinions of some writers), a quality bow with accompanying arrows, and fitted armor.

The smaller nations, then, would raise armies as needed, and the armorers/blacksmiths of those nations would rapidly convert the metal of farm and carpentry tools into weapons.

Therefore, one would see simple edged weapons, meaning, straight double-edged large knives or small swords, with an eye towards the economic use of metal.

Amongst the more formidable, expensive swords intended for elite forces, one would tend to see Kopis, Kukri, Falcata, or Yataghan types of swords, with a forward bend to them that placed the sweet spot ahead of the long axis of the wielder's forearm.

Most commonly, though, I think one would see simple, straight, double-edged short swords or large knives strapped to the thighs of front line soldiers.

These short sword or large dagger types of weapons would probably measure 18" in total length, also known as a cubit, and which corresponds to the typical length of the upper thigh from the top of the femur (sometimes called hip, but not referring to the wing of the pelvic crest) to the pivot of the knee.

A cubit, or 18", corresponds to the maximum length that a soldier can carry strapped to his thigh, and which still allows free athletic movement.

One will see this type of straight double-edged knife/sword (Gladius Hispanius) recurring again and again, cyclically, throughout the history of warfare with edged weapons.

So, as a general statement regarding swords of this period, a larger sword, intended for elite forces, and used to defeat light armor, will have a forward bend in it, as does the sickle sword, the Kopis, the Yataghan, the Kukri and the Falcata; and the smaller sword, reforged out of farm and carpentry tools, will have a straight double-edged design measuring 18" in total length.

The Hebrews, Israelites and Jews, as quickly-raised and non-standing army, would carry those short swords they could make quickly out of farm and carpentry tools, or which they could afford to keep privately (merchants and traders carried a short sword or heavy dagger as self-defense from bandits).

As an alternative to the double-edged short sword or heavy dagger, one might also see a single edged long knife or short sword, along the lines of the Seax:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seax

The Greek word machaira occurs most frequently (29 times) in the bible when referring to a fighting sword or knife, and also when referring to a large butcher or meat cutting knife.

The machaira corresponds most closely to the seax (or the seax corresponds to the machaira), and, as such, represents a large knife or short sword that a man might keep around as a multi-purpose blade, and which he might take into battle with him if conscripted into an army.

The other Greek word, rhomphia, used to denote a sword, occurs only in the book of the Revelation, and it refers to a large cavalry type of sword or saber, having either a swept, trailing point, or a foward yataghan bend which we see in 19th century European "S" shaped cavalry sabers.

In conclusion, think short, 18", and either single or double-edged.
 
Along with the seax, the Scottish Dirk, as in the Cold Steel version below, at 18 and 3/8", represents, in proportion, the commonly recurring single-edged version of the short sword or heavy dagger.

http://www.coldsteel.com/88sd.html

This single-edged version has the advantage of greater strength, due to its thick spine, and greater ease of zone tempering/hardening the edge.

The above probably, apart from cultural design embellishments, represents the machaira with which Peter cut off the soldier's ear in the Garden of Gethsemane.
 
Mr Cox

Many thanks for the information. The history lesson was also most helpful in getting a mind set for possible blade designs, and handle materials, bearing in mind these blades would be expected to also serve in daily duties!

I think I will start off with a modest Seax type blade with a full tang. Later, once I make a few mods to my little forge, I want to tackle a Kopis type sword.

Thanks again for endulging a rookie's questions!
 
Back
Top