- Joined
- Jun 6, 2000
- Messages
- 3,625
OK, this is a question for the guys and gals.
I own a ot of knives, a heck of a lot of knives and have a good level of outdoor skills and experience. I have a lot of bushcrafter friends and have learnt a lot from them and practical use in the field.
I see a heck of a lot of knives and use a lot of different styles and types.
My current carry in the field is a 1.Leatherman Charge, 2.Alan Wood Woodlore/Falkenkniven Idun/ Bark River Highland special, 3.HI Chiwa Kukri/Falkenkiven A2/Trailmaster.
This is backed up with a good folder like my Damascus Tom Brown "Quest" or my Strider AR TAC.
Well I have heard a lot of hype about the Busse line and to be frank don't hold much weight in such things until I have tried it myself, thus I will ignore such claims and simply ask, would I be better with a Busse or a Swamp Rat blade? I like the look of both series of blades and the price difference is noticable, but do the guys and gals think for general field use that a Busse would be noticably better than a Swamp Rat blade?
I won't be chopping steel bars or concrete and just want a good hard use larger blade without paying over the odds for performance I will not need.
I understand the Busse and SW range are high performers and are well regarded. You are not hearing me complain about this! I just wonder if you chaps think I would need the Busse performance difference and honestly ask you how much extra do you get over a SW blade?
Like all things, the rule of diminishing returns states that once you reach a certain level of performance you have to spend a heck of a lot more to get even a small increase. My thinking is that the SW range are very high performers and the Busse range are in the position of spending a lot more to get a little extra, like quality HI-FI components.
Do I need that "little extra"? What do you think?
I own a ot of knives, a heck of a lot of knives and have a good level of outdoor skills and experience. I have a lot of bushcrafter friends and have learnt a lot from them and practical use in the field.
I see a heck of a lot of knives and use a lot of different styles and types.
My current carry in the field is a 1.Leatherman Charge, 2.Alan Wood Woodlore/Falkenkniven Idun/ Bark River Highland special, 3.HI Chiwa Kukri/Falkenkiven A2/Trailmaster.
This is backed up with a good folder like my Damascus Tom Brown "Quest" or my Strider AR TAC.
Well I have heard a lot of hype about the Busse line and to be frank don't hold much weight in such things until I have tried it myself, thus I will ignore such claims and simply ask, would I be better with a Busse or a Swamp Rat blade? I like the look of both series of blades and the price difference is noticable, but do the guys and gals think for general field use that a Busse would be noticably better than a Swamp Rat blade?
I won't be chopping steel bars or concrete and just want a good hard use larger blade without paying over the odds for performance I will not need.
I understand the Busse and SW range are high performers and are well regarded. You are not hearing me complain about this! I just wonder if you chaps think I would need the Busse performance difference and honestly ask you how much extra do you get over a SW blade?
Like all things, the rule of diminishing returns states that once you reach a certain level of performance you have to spend a heck of a lot more to get even a small increase. My thinking is that the SW range are very high performers and the Busse range are in the position of spending a lot more to get a little extra, like quality HI-FI components.
Do I need that "little extra"? What do you think?
