Not entirely, as high carbon and low carbon steels were forged together to create the pattern...in some cases as in Japan, others yes, it is commonly THOUGHT that alloy banding is responsible, but for pattern, there was purposeful AESTHETIC manipulation of the steel, ie Muhammed's Ladder.
The ancient swordmakers also exploited the aesthetic qualities of pattern welded steel. The
Vikings in particular were fond of twisting bars of steel around each other, welding the bars together by hammering and then repeating the process with the resulting bars, to create complex patterns in the final steel bar. Two bars twisted in opposite directions created the common chevron pattern. Often, the center of the blade was a core of soft steel, and the edges were solid high carbon steel, similar to the laminates of the Japanese.
Now ask Ed about carburized wrought iron, which is THOUGHT to be a common component of early damascus....
The problem is that no one REALLY knows that much about damascus...the Germans were doing some superb work with it 100 years ago....and admittedly the strides Bladesmiths have made in the last 10 years(stainless damascus, feather pattern damascus, performance damascus....)have been amazing, it is hardly a NEW material.
Wootz steel and Damascus steel
Evidence of the earliest production of high carbon steel in South Asia were found in the Samanalawewa area in Sri Lanka. Wootz steel was produced in India and Sri Lanka from around 300 BC. Along with their original methods of forging steel, the Chinese had also adopted the production methods of creating Wootz steel, an idea imported from India to China by the 5th century AD. This early steel-making method in Sri Lanka employed the unique use of a wind furnace, blown by the monsoon winds and produced almost pure steel. Also known as Damascus steel, wootz is famous for its durability and ability to hold an edge. It was originally created from a number of different materials including various trace elements. It was essentially a complicated alloy with iron as its main component. Recent studies have suggested that carbon nanotubes were included in its structure, which might explain some of its legendary qualities, though given the technology available at that time, they were produced by chance rather than by design.
Now, imo, this early steel had less in common with Ed's 52100 than you would like to think.
Best Regards,
STeven Garsson
Steven,
Well, ok. .., but is what you said true? Predates monosteel?
i thought "ancient" damascus was actually a monosteel, w/ elements used to alloy, or such as sand. The swirly appearance as a byproduct of the normal cooling of steel in a crucible from a molten state (monosteel) in a crucible, this process created chemical segregation, or banding. Which you could term "damascus". But is disimilar to todays modern "damascus", the combining of two different steels?
Warm and fuzzy thoughts,
David