How being left handed saved my life !

Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
4,106
No I,m not talking about when that Grizzly chewed off my right arm ! (Thats another story ! ) L:O:L

I am talking about education . I was born at the tail end of but not subject to the age where lefties were pummeled , punished and persecuted . Yep , good old Irish Roman Catholic schooling . Let us just say that old machinery belts and straps were put to good use . Just before my time, knuckles were rapped , arms were tied behind backs , derision , suspicion and blame were heaped upon the manually deficient . Yes we lefties led a charmed life .
All I received was a mild suggestion that I learn to use my right hand .
Ha says I .
All my right hand was for was to confound and confuse right handed pugilists while my left hand ended their confusion for the next little while ! L:O:L

That having been said , they couldn,t teach me to write . I held onto that stylus in a death grip that literally broke some pencils . Smudged and torn papers , headaches and frustration on both mine and the teachers part .I was finally left to my own devices which was the best thing that could have been done for someone willing to learn . With the basis painfully learnt I taught myself the finer points . Actually being able to read what I write is another matter . Eventually with patience and understanding I eventually pulled it off . I had learned to teach myself . This was in a time where you were taught, not so much as learned anything . It was when we "learned by rote " If they wanted you to learn multiplication tables you would write them out until you knew them. If you didn,t remember them the first time then the hundred and first time would do . Latin ? As I said I just missed that one and it was lucky for them or I would have snapped . (Or at least snapped thiings off of them ! ) L:O:L
Writing out a dead language "ad nauseum" just wouldn,t have been my cuppa tea .

I personally think this form of education led to slow learners and by extension slow thinkers . If methods were not used or known of to communicate the lesson in a palatable manner then how can it not produce dullards ? If you force education into someones ears by the pounded sand method how can they become or stay open minded ? If you try to induce cerebral memory by enforcing muscle memory then to me you slow down the mind to the speed of the body .
I think I was partially immunised against this by my inability to conform physically . I did partially learn my multiplication tables by "rote" I also taught myself innovative methods to utilise and maximise the potential of their commutative property which was of good use to me in electrical pipe bending . adding 2 5/8ths + 3 5/16ths to figure out the losses gained when curving a straght pipe into a radius may be a breeze to you math gurus . You just try her out when you have a multi horse powered 48 inch radius, diamond encrusted cement saw screaming in your ear like you married an Irish banshee and she is politely enquiring as to why you forgot to come home last night ! L:O:L

I will let this torrent dribble to a close on the suggestive and inquisitive burble of what I would like to know . Does anyone know of methods one can teach oneself on how to learn ? I know thats approaching the oxymoronic . (I used to think oxymorons were people who were reduced to idiocy by a deprivation of oxygen !) (Ah self education !) L:O:L
I do believe method may be in and of itself a hindrance . At this stage of my life I am content to follow methods to achieve goals . I used to think that to shape something that you had to have "a gift" for it . I have since learned that if one follows a method you can turn out a workmanlike job without being particularly gifted .

Are their self teaching methods ?

I once bought a book called "The Art of Readable Writing " I couldn,t read it ! L:O:L It was flipping boring ! L:M:A:O: I think you do get my point here . It has to be a viable method. It is all fine and good as well as apreciated if you tell me of viable methods to learn quantum physics . The only "quadular physics" I need learn in my life is how to make coffee table legs using beer bottles .
(I did achieve this though it made the beer hard to drink without spilling the other three !) L:O:L
If its an innovative method that circumvented some shortcoming of your own ? Throw it in the pot we can all use innovation in our lives .
If it is a method taught in other countries ? All the better as long as it doesn,t lose something in the translation . (In other words if its a method that is based upon a learning system totally foreign in concept it won,t do much good .)

I will throw one out there that is very good though indirect . Learn another language . While not a direct method to learning in itself it is wonderfully broadening . I think that different sentence structures lead to different mindsets . This is very good for problem solving . It allows you to see problems from different perspectives . I had this math teacher who loved to confound the astounded , or was that astound the confounded ?
Students couldn,t see how he arrived with the solution he wanted and what he previously stated would be . I pointed out to these reasonably inteligent kids that it was easy to solve a problem if you started out viewing it from its solution . (in other words its easy to drive the nail home when its you holding the hammer !) It was lost upon them as they could only view the problem from the perspective of having the solution unknown to them .This may be uni-dimensional thinking ? I don,t know .

So hows about it ? Anyone have learning methods or even philosophies that approach problems and tasks from different perspectives ?
 
Gee I dunno, I have been palying tennis with this leftie for years....

Still cannot stand his leftie slice serves for crying out loud ! :(

Still no win from him . :(
 
Astrodada said:
Gee I dunno, I have been palying tennis with this leftie for years....

Still cannot stand his leftie slice serves for crying out loud ! :(

Still no win from him . :(

You only win cause they don,t make left handed tennis rackets . L:O:L Seriously though the machines that make the artificial gut to string the rackets cut it into lengths with a reverse helical bias which favours right handed players ! If you believe that one I have no hope for you ! L:O:L
 
"I will throw one out there that is very good though indirect . Learn another language . While not a direct method to learning in itself it is wonderfully broadening . I think that different sentence structures lead to different mindsets . This is very good for problem solving . It allows you to see problems from different perspectives ."

I agree here. I'm just beginning to learn spanish, and I find that you approach a problem differently when you speak it out to yourself in a different language. Right now I'm on very simple phrases. Mostly centered around beer/cerveza, but I do get your drift.
 
Kevin the grey said:
You only win cause they don,t make left handed tennis rackets . L:O:L Seriously though the machines that make the artificial gut to string the rackets cut it into lengths with a reverse helical bias which favours right handed players ! If you believe that one I have no hope for you ! L:O:L

No seriously strings dun help.....I am trying....to develope a two handed backhand like Sharapovas' (the cute russian gal) in order to counter the leftie but to no avail yet. :o
 
Kevin, I stuttered bad enough that I always had 3 or 4 other words ready to go if the first one didn't fly.

From your thread the strongest point to me is that no matter what method one uses to learn, you are ultimately learning by yourself.



munk
 
Astrodada said:
No seriously strings dun help.....I am trying....to develope a two handed backhand like Sharapovas' (the cute russian gal) in order to counter the leftie but to no avail yet. :o

Some lefties are more imaginative and so may be prey to monotonous rhythms . Try delivering a series of monotonous yet challenging sameness to him and then something a-rhythmic and eccentric . If not try the opposite, perplexing responses . If you are set up for a slam ? Dribble it over the net .

If this doesn,t work ? Your leap of victory over the net may be reduced to bowing low to the true King of the court ! Lefties Rule ! L:O:L
 
munk said:
Kevin, I stuttered bad enough that I always had 3 or 4 other words ready to go if the first one didn't fly.

From your thread the strongest point to me is that no matter what method one uses to learn, you are ultimately learning by yourself.



munk
Not so much for stuttering as speaking my second language . If my fellow conversor doesn,t comprehend my first approach I have already thought of a second word . Their words are much more definition specific
You can tell them to turn left . You can,t tell tham to finish what is left on their plate . They would dutifully eat only what is on the left side of their plate . All the while muttering "Stupid english pig dog . I fart in your general direction ! ) L:O:L
 
I agree here. I'm just beginning to learn spanish, and I find that you approach a problem differently when you speak it out to yourself in a different language. Right now I'm on very simple phrases. Mostly centered around beer/cerveza, but I do get your drift.[/QUOTE]

REPLY : I think Spanish is perfect it is not only structured differently the cadence and emphasis is different as well . At the very least it may change thought process speed to allow a different approach to become apparent . Spanish beer ? Thatsanother story

I was asked by my French buddies why I learned to speak French by immersion instead of by more scholarly means . I told them it was so I could make love to their women ! Apparently this was the wrong answer ! L:O:L
Seriously though as a kid I would be chasing the sweet mademoiselles around and fail miserably cause I couldn,t even ask where they lived . Finally I learned enough and then had to learn how to deal with older brothers who really didn,t want English pig dogs dating little sister . .
Problem solving 101 ." How to bleed and still look cool"
 
Kevin?

You seemed to have answered your own inquiry, in part. You taught yourself by developing techniques that worked for you.

Long ago and far away, I studied Improvisation for the Theater--first as a lark, then as an art form, then as a performance training techinique, and finally as a business--training corporate employees by making them "challenge" or respond to complaints of employees on a face-to-face basis, either using their recently-acquired training, or company policy changes to explain why core benefits were being modified.

The work was a hoot, the solicitation of business was annoying.

However...

Viola Spolin was a teacher in Chicago who developed a series of "games" or training techniques to teach theater to kids and adults through a WPA program, encouraging them to use their imaginations, rather than costumes, props, or scenery. This was done, in part, because there was no money, but also (as she suggests in retrospect--a technique I'm always suspicious of) because each individual brings a different set of knowledge and experience to the learning situation.

Her son, Paul Sills, went on to found the Compass Players at the Univ. of Chicago, circa 1956-59, which evolved into SECOND CITY. And the professional theater art form of "Improvisation" was born.

The key for the training I did was to get people to DO the things they were being trained to do; i.e., if there were benefit cuts, to have to explain exactly WHY and WHAT was being changed or taken away, and justify it (if possible), based on what they had learned in the training session. I was the disgruntled employee(s) and knew as much or more about the benefits as did they, AND I wouldn't let them weasel their way out of a confrontation.

I dealt with ignorance, bigotry, corporate elite-ism, laziness, company loyalty, age-ism---well, all the stuff that usually doesn't get addressed in training sessions. I did it face-to-face. After each session, we opened it up to the audience to discuss what worked and why, and what didn't and why.

So...(I am sorry for the length of this)...I think if it is a behavior you are trying to learn, then one needs first, to be aware of his current behavior; and second, to be able to consider alternatives which are outside the current situation. This is behavior change.

For knowledge acquistion...without a particular situation or learning skill or body of knowledge you desire being specified...it is kind of tough to offer any alternatives for you to consider.

For instance, you can get a Gaelic-Enlish dictionary (actually, there are some on-line) but, even if you memorized it, you couldn't speak Gaelic, because the pronounciations are totally different. You'd need a teacher of some sort to help you. Or Devangari, or...

Or Cherokee: Yvsa is pronounced "Yuh nSuh." Go figure.

My experience...you gotta do what you wanna do to be able to do it...either through problem-solving, rote learning, or practice. One becomes skillful by practicing the skills.

But most importantly you gotta want to do it. Motivation of some sort is essential--whether it is good grades, necessary knowledge to perform a task, or monetary reward.

(jeez, I'm sorry about the length of this.)
 
Good post. I'm probably not supposed to say that, Kismet; but good post.


In the end, the tools that have found you, and you them, are the means of change when you are so motivated.







munk
 
While I do agree that in the end we teach ourselves I think that we may learn to teach ourselves to learn in different manners . Even if it as simple as approaching a problem with the philosophy "fix the problem , not the blame ."It is something we may teach ourselves and behaviour we can teach ourselves to avoid .
On a separate note I know of a teacher who politely and with infinite patience kept teaching the same student the same lesson in the same manner for an entire afternoon . He was determined enough , patient enough and proabably stubborn enough to see this through . It never occured to him that he was distressing the student by keeping at this relentlessly . If he had a different approach or perhaps a different set of teaching tools from which he might choose there may have been a quicker or more fulfilling response .

I think I will have to look into this some more . I know a variety of trainers teachers and professors . Everything from fencing , archery , music and economics . It may be a more direct approach is whats needed . I do hope that some of you may have picked up lessons along the way as well . I am very fortunate in having taken hundreds of courses in my life and so have been exposed to a wide range of teaching styles and personalities . I think I may have to tap into that resource .
 
Hi All, I'm lefthanded and I've got a multitude of learning problems, but it has not been without real dificulty overcoming them. Things that have helped: Playing Chess with all pieces colored the same (marked on the bottom: W or B) to reduce bloodshed. If you capture a piece and it turns out to be one of your own.......tough.
And play "cutthroat" Bridge. Play both for money:eek: . You will be amazed at how easy learning other things become.
Dan
 
Different techniques work in different circumstances. When I studied Basic Russian in the Air Force, it was by rote and repetition. Then when new words got thrown in they fit right into the patterns we already learned. A philosophical approach to learning a language quickly and thoroughly is a contradiction in terms.

By the way, Spanish and even French are almost identical with English in their underlying grammar. You need to go farther afield to get a real difference in the way the language puts ideas together, like Swahili or Hebrew or Japanese.

A lot of it comes down to the individual. My brother and I grew up togetheer, close in age, got along fine. He's good at math and music, I lean towards language and history. It's an evolutionary advantage in a society, that whatever goes wrong, someone will have the mindset to deal with it.
 
Kismet, I think there is a lot of good suggestions in your post . I will have to look it over a couple of times to garner exactly what is of use to me . I especially liked your reference to learning Gaelic as that is one of my projects for the future . Ireland is in the midst of changing some street signs back from the English language to Gaelic which is close to my heart as I live in a province that changed all street signs back from English to French a while ago . I have nothing against the English B:T:W: . Its just a lesson in history , "migration"(euphemistic term) and perhaps coming to terms with the past . Hopefully without succumbing (sp) to it . I am lucky in having learned basic French first in that sentence structure is similar . I liked your reference to the corporate world and downplaying the "downsizing" of company benefits which seemed to be the focus of your efforts . It is kinda like "Irish diplomacy" which is telling someone to go to hell in a manner where he looks forward to the journey ! L:O:L

Esav ? On a separate note ? I,m not too much up on grammar as most of my language lessons were learned in the boudoir "a la pillowtalk"(French Ladies are certainly adept with their native tongue .) I,m pretty certain that Gaelic and French have basic and profound differences from English .It is one of the reasons that some mono-cultural English have difficulty learning French or Gaelic beyond the basics . It is the French view and certainly not one to be given much weight to that English isn,t even a true language . I am working on helping a friend or two to learn Gaelic and by this hoping to learn it myself . My friend ,a very bright individual is frustrated by her lack of success despite putting a good effort into it . I,m trying to show her that it is like trying to stable a horse with the "barn door already closed" . This backwards half a$$ed analogy is just to show that the effort put in does little good if you go about it in a backwards manner .

I am glad of the homestyle views and creative methods shown here to educate ourselves and others . Everything from total immersion to breaking things down into small steps has been proffered here . Perhaps in the coming weeks I will come up with a couple of contributions on the physical education side of things .
 
Bill Marsh said:
Sounds 'sinister' to me, being dexterous myself.:)

Thats the spirit ! While I am somewhat ambidextrous I am a true lefty who is perplexed in a right handed and slightly undersized world . I have cut myself on screen door jambs that just didn,t make room for a left handed approach . It took me so long to get used to right handed scissors that when I unknowingly tried a lefthanded pair I threw them down in disgust .

Beware of the dexterous ! You never know what that other hand is up to ! L:O:L

B:T:W: Someone stated that I would have to be specific as to what I was trying to learn for them to know how to help me ? While the answer is everything it is obviously not a good thing to try and learn everything . Lets stick to learning a second or third language and learning to carve or shape wood for the sake of narrowing it down to a couple of my interests . I,m mostly interested in rasping and shaving and the languages I want to learn have different sentence structures from basic English . I am more interested in approaches to education in general and I will garner what I need . Someone just asked for me to be specific .
 
Good post, with allot of emotional respondings.
Take it from an Old Fart..
Move your computer mouse to your opposite hand..NOW !
The next time you use a screwdriver , do it " wrong handed"
Then.
The next time you open a box, with a knife, do it " wrong handed"
After a few months... try writing " wrong handed".. not a letter, obviously.. Just magic marker type stuff.
Shoot your gun " wrong handed".. Rifles are much more difficult, due to a " dominate eye"..
Hand guns are applicable here.
You will be on your way to being TOTALLY ambidexterous.. ( sex does NOT apply) ;) :cool: :D :eek: :jerkit:
 
Ireland is in the midst of changing some street signs back from the English language to Gaelic which is close to my heart as I live in a province that changed all street signs back from English to French a while ago .
There's a great story about the Irish ambassador to the League of Nations, who always gave his speeches in French. When they asked him, why French, he said, "I can't speak my own language and I'll be damned if I'll speak English!"
 
Blammo said:
Move your computer mouse to your opposite hand..NOW !
The next time you use a screwdriver , do it " wrong handed"
Then.
The next time you open a box, with a knife, do it " wrong handed"
After a few months... try writing " wrong handed".. not a letter, obviously.. Just magic marker type stuff.
Shoot your gun " wrong handed".. Rifles are much more difficult, due to a " dominate eye"..
Hand guns are applicable here.
It's fun to try.

I routinely switch my mouse from hand to hand, especially when I'm online a while and I'm not moving much except for that mouse hand.

As far as using a knife in your opposite hand, look at how much trouble people have cutting straight with a weak-side chisel grind!

Years ago, when I was first studying linguistics, I studied different writing systems, mostly alphabets. I did everything I could to learn to control my handwriting so I could do all those strange letters right. Including writing left-handed, both print and script, normal and mirror-image.

Here's an exercise for you: write a line in mirror-image right-handed and then the same line under it left-handed faced the right way.
 
Back
Top