So you always hear people comparing steels on the basis of edge retention. But my question is what exactly do you guys consider to still be acceptably sharp? I'm always a little let down when I go through a box or two and my m390 or s110v is already unable to shave, even though I know that it will keep cutting boxes forever.
This is often referred to as a "working edge". But IMO a knife isn't SHARP unless it can shave. So how can I claim that any steels have exceptional edge retention when they all fail to hold the edge I want them to, and I never use them past the stage at which they still meet my standards?
It feels like I'm not really getting the full benefit of the better steels because I don't usually use them past the shaving sharp stage. Almost any cutlery steel could go through its whole life just cutting a box or two and getting touched up back to the same sharpness......so is there any real point in me dropping more cash on super steels? Other than to make me feel good, of course
I know the simple answer is for me to just use them more before sharpening.... But like I said, it just irks me to have a less-than-shaving edge in my pocket......
Thoughts?
This is often referred to as a "working edge". But IMO a knife isn't SHARP unless it can shave. So how can I claim that any steels have exceptional edge retention when they all fail to hold the edge I want them to, and I never use them past the stage at which they still meet my standards?
It feels like I'm not really getting the full benefit of the better steels because I don't usually use them past the shaving sharp stage. Almost any cutlery steel could go through its whole life just cutting a box or two and getting touched up back to the same sharpness......so is there any real point in me dropping more cash on super steels? Other than to make me feel good, of course
I know the simple answer is for me to just use them more before sharpening.... But like I said, it just irks me to have a less-than-shaving edge in my pocket......
Thoughts?