In my case, I was the originator of the "Community forum" concept back before BF started. Odd thing is, I'd planned it for someone else
. Back on Knifeforums long ago a particular "General forum" (equivelent to BF's main forum) moderator got rotated out, there was some controversy, I figured "General" was too big anyways so off-knife-topic and humor stuff could be carved off making a home for the individual in question, improving KF and ending the controversy. What the heck - the "individual" was Mike Turber
so when he fired up BF, he liked the idea but didn't need it personally so he offered it to me
.
(For the record: KF is under new ownership, the original controversy is ancient history.)
------------------
Everyone is responsible for their own reputation online. That's always been true, and it won't change. You gather what I sometimes call "credibility points", and the reason you never want to get in a flamewar with somebody is that it'll COST you "credibility points", WIN OR LOSE
.
You might be completely in the right, but "if you roll around in the mud don't be shocked if somebody thinks you're a pig"
.
Now Gunner, I'm *not* saying you're guilty of any of the above
. I'm just giving general examples
. No insults even slightly implied
.
The BF moderators are either people of exceptional general credibility (example: James Mattis, Bald1, Cliff, Joe Talmadge, MANY others) or they bring a particular skill to a technical forum, such as the people running Shop Talk, Wilderness, or the various tacticals.
Or they've got a maker/manufacturer/dealer forum, in which case I think they should be allowed to run that "as if it was in their shop"...so you get different "cultural flavors" for each. The Spydie forum is more businesslike than "Bill Martino's Mutant Bar and Grill" as we like to call it
.
Eventually, I'd like to see a "mechanics and general engineering" forum run by someone who's a better mechanic than myself
. A good idea for a forum is always welcome for discussion but final approval is Mike's of course.
Jim