This brings up a good point.
I know I have trouble trying to judge a knife when it's made from foreign steel. I do know some of the common ones, like Crucible's 154-CM is the same as Hitachi's ATS-34. However, when Extrema Ratio came out, they were made of a steel I had never heard of. The quality was excellent, so by inductive reasoning, the steel must be good, as well, but how do you compare?
This recently happened when a knife became available in some shuffling. The knife was made of AUS-8.
About all I knew was that AUS-8 was better than AUS-6. But I have also seen suffixes like AUS-6A and AUS-6M. For some of these steels I can run to my brother-in-law who is a metalurgist in Milwaukee. Sometimes even he needs time to research items.
About all I know from scuttlebutt is that AUS-8 is 'like about 440C.'
That's well and good. I know there's listings of the components used in steels, but I am not a metalurgist; if one steel has more vanadium in it than another, is it better for use as a knife? I know from experience that sharpening S60V was a pain and S90V made it easier, although I don't know why?
I know we're supposed to be 'knuts' and understand this stuff, but some of it baffles me. It can happen, some of my friends who are gear-heads keep confusing the terms 'blower' and 'super charger.'
I wish I had a simple desk reference.