I always been impressed by the ZT0100 fixed blade by ZT knives. Kershaw got many things right in the design. The current (May '08) Blade reports that "Kershaw performed destruction trials on the prototypes, including flex tests in which it took an impressive 4,500 pounds of pressure to break the blade." The ZT0100 uses CPM 3V carbon steel, perhaps the best for this type of knife, (INFI fans would dispute that). There are only a few cutlers using CPM 3V, notably Fehrman and K9.
I ran across a discussion of the ZT0100 at a site http://kitup.military.com/2007/11/stiring-the-pot.html where most of the posters appeared to be military vets of various vintages. Typical coments about the ZT0100's MSRP of almost $300, went something like this:
Three bills for a knife! That is laughable, and I would laugh at anyone who dropped that much on a standard knife... spending that much on a tool one would be afraid to use it and heck breakdown crying if it were lost or broken... For a tool a person is going to use, a Ka-Bar, a Gerber or any other well known brands that cost a tenth of what that thing costs so it won't hurt when you scratch, scuff, mar, rust, chip, break and loose it or it is stolen which it would be...Cool looking coupled with a high price tag doesn't cut it in the field....
Other posters extolled the Ka-Bar. One said that it could be hammered into a tree and used as a step.
Do they have a point, poor grammar notwithstanding? Is it dumb to spend $300 on a 'user' knife, no matter how good? The obvious counter is that if the $300 knife saves a life, it is money well spent. But is that just a rationalization of knife nuts? Is it just a scheme to make knife sellers rich, as some posters suggested?
The other obvious counter is that it is the buyer's money. I would not spend $300 (or more) on a less efficient aftermarket motorcycle muffler, but I wouldn't laugh at somebody who did. It's their money, and the great thing about America is that they can spend it as stupidly as they please.
But is it still stupid? How much is too much for a 'user' knife?
I ran across a discussion of the ZT0100 at a site http://kitup.military.com/2007/11/stiring-the-pot.html where most of the posters appeared to be military vets of various vintages. Typical coments about the ZT0100's MSRP of almost $300, went something like this:
Three bills for a knife! That is laughable, and I would laugh at anyone who dropped that much on a standard knife... spending that much on a tool one would be afraid to use it and heck breakdown crying if it were lost or broken... For a tool a person is going to use, a Ka-Bar, a Gerber or any other well known brands that cost a tenth of what that thing costs so it won't hurt when you scratch, scuff, mar, rust, chip, break and loose it or it is stolen which it would be...Cool looking coupled with a high price tag doesn't cut it in the field....
Other posters extolled the Ka-Bar. One said that it could be hammered into a tree and used as a step.
Do they have a point, poor grammar notwithstanding? Is it dumb to spend $300 on a 'user' knife, no matter how good? The obvious counter is that if the $300 knife saves a life, it is money well spent. But is that just a rationalization of knife nuts? Is it just a scheme to make knife sellers rich, as some posters suggested?
The other obvious counter is that it is the buyer's money. I would not spend $300 (or more) on a less efficient aftermarket motorcycle muffler, but I wouldn't laugh at somebody who did. It's their money, and the great thing about America is that they can spend it as stupidly as they please.
But is it still stupid? How much is too much for a 'user' knife?