Just so that I don't become a sacrificial goat here, please allow me to clarify a few points:
First, I wrote the initial comment off the top of my head and labeled it as rambling, thinking out loud. I immediately thought of numerous people making damascus whose efforts are proudly displayed on many high-end collectors pieces wherein the makers use the specific "brand" as a selling point of their work. It would obviously be much harder to sell an $8k folder with "no name" damascus. (Please, don't get immediately insulted by the term "no name". Datsuns didn't sell so well initially, either!)
I stand by my comments about competition in business needing a "hook". That's taught in every business class there is. There has to be an appeal to sway people away from the old standards. It can be pricing, style, innovation, catchy marketing, etc. Even then, many fine ideas have gone under because of poor marketing or competitive pressures.
However, Darren's comments make some good sense. If this is a hobbyist venture, and sales are expected to be localized geographically or to the "middle" and hobbyist knifemaker market where profititable fulltime business isn't a significant concern, then it changes the prospectus, neh?
Knifemaking is a good example in itself. There are many makers busting their butt for little profit and having the time of their lives doing it. Thus, in the scenario of the "for fun" intent it takes on a different set of considerations. It would take quite awhile to pay off a power hammer, grinder, press, surface grinder, etc, though, so those things needs be factored in when considering the profitability. Those tools add up to a lot of damascus.
It all depends on the premises for entry into the endeavor.
I come to "purchased damascus" with an old set of biases. I can easily remember when a damascus blade was NEVER displayed for sale unless the maker made the steel himself. Times have changed immensely. My thoughts were for the well-known, fulltime maker market, but obviously it is much different now. The points made here by you others are quite valid, and my remarks should be taken only within the context of the constraints I mentioned.
BTW, Darren, please respond to my email with a request for your address so I can send this DVD, please. I lost it.