- Joined
- Oct 20, 2000
- Messages
- 4,453
I sometimes wonder how does the Spyderco top brass assess the opinions of Spyderco enthusiasts?
It is no doublt quite a chore to sieve through the bagfuls of views and opinions of collectors and fans from all over the globe.
Understandably, most opinions would be based on emotions and individual perceptions. But being a collector, one does have the luxury of making all kinds of suggestions without a forethought of its practical considerations.
From the commercial standpoint, an erroneous judgement in deciding on the production of a particular blade can mean substantial losses, and you can't have too many of that.
So what are the signs that the Spyderco head honchos would look for, to ensure that a suggestion or viewpoint, in its practical application, can at least have a 60 per cent chance of being a winner?
It is no doublt quite a chore to sieve through the bagfuls of views and opinions of collectors and fans from all over the globe.
Understandably, most opinions would be based on emotions and individual perceptions. But being a collector, one does have the luxury of making all kinds of suggestions without a forethought of its practical considerations.
From the commercial standpoint, an erroneous judgement in deciding on the production of a particular blade can mean substantial losses, and you can't have too many of that.
So what are the signs that the Spyderco head honchos would look for, to ensure that a suggestion or viewpoint, in its practical application, can at least have a 60 per cent chance of being a winner?