- Joined
- Jan 2, 2013
- Messages
- 1,508
I was bored earlier today, so I decided to do some cut testing. I grabbed a cardboard box and decided to dismember it with my ZT 200. Much to my surprise, however, the task proved quite difficult. For comparisons sake, I decided to switch to my Spyderco Tenacious, which made predictably short work of the box.
The ZT I used was quite sharp, capable of slicing phonebook paper, although the Tenacious was much sharper. I am aware the edge and blade geometry is quite different on both of these knives, but why did my knife with a heavy recurve seem to do so poorly? Is my technique off or is that simply the nature of the beast so to speak?
The ZT I used was quite sharp, capable of slicing phonebook paper, although the Tenacious was much sharper. I am aware the edge and blade geometry is quite different on both of these knives, but why did my knife with a heavy recurve seem to do so poorly? Is my technique off or is that simply the nature of the beast so to speak?