The rockwell hardness on knives have always confused me. I mean 4116 can be hardened to 58-59 rockwell and so can S30V.
Yes, it can, but who does?
But we all know S30V blows the crap out of 4116 at the same hardness.
Does it? Have you found a comparision test? I would like to see it. Show me the link please!
Most of the times, blades, made from 1.4116 are tempered down to HRC 56 - 57. If there was a blade of this steel that hard, i would be very interested in.
I heard it's an indicator of heat treating but Scrapyard knives says a steel heat treated to 58-59 HRC in one hour isn't as good as a steel heat treated to 58-59 in 3 days.
You must be really into heat treating, to know, why Scrapyard needs a long heat treatment. But HRC is not an indicator for the heat treating process.
So what gives? Whats the use of HRC because it doesn't seem to indicate wear resistance, toughness, or stain resistance?
It indicates hardness. But have a look at the steel datas from Crucible Steels about 154CM. You see, how different a HRC 60 can be.
Most edges from high alloyed steel grades (that are what is offerd to 95%, like 154CM, S30V, 440C, and so on) benefit from a higher hardness. Just my personal experience. The + in toughness in that steel grades is minor.
The range of hardness advertised, can indicate how well the heat treating process is controlled. The closer the hardness range, the better. But that, can´t stand alone. To judge from the hardenss information to the edge quality misses first hand consumer information.
I don´t want to miss the hardness information.