HT Regimen for High Alloy Stainless Steels.

Stacy E. Apelt - Bladesmith

ilmarinen - MODERATOR
Moderator
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
38,480
In a recent thread about the HT for a high alloy stainless steel, the advantage/disadvantage of oil quench was discussed. Since I had a "free" hour this morning ( daylight savings time ), I spent it doing some reading of old information. I re-read Roman Landes' theory and application of austenitzation and quenching high alloy and stainless steels and how to tweak the HT to get the most from these steels. For those who don't know Roman Landes , he wrote the book ( literally and figuratively) on HT for knife steels.....Messer und Stahl.

Anyway, I decided to condense some of his posts on another forum into a fairly compact regimen with a little explanation, but not getting too technical.

The steels that will benefit from this process are CPM 3V, CPM 154, the CPM S__V series, and other complex alloy steels.
All information given assumes the user will have a good understanding of the HT of stainless steel, and the various methods of oxygen exclusion, quenching, etc.

The Crucible charts for these steels are based on a commercial operation and the HT done industrially. As knifemakers, we have the ability to fine tune the HT to gain a little here and there. An industry doesn't have that luxury. This doesn't make the Crucible charts wrong, it just makes the possibility of getting a bit more from the steel a reality.

The main stages of the HT for complex steels are:
Pre-heat
Austenitization
Quench/cooling
Sub-zero and Cryo - completion of the cooling process
Temper

Let's take these individually:
Pre-heat - Complex steels need time to change from one phase to another. You need to allow these changes to occur and stabilize/equalize before moving the steel into another change. Most complex steels should be evenly heated to above 1200F/650C and then taken to 1500F/815C and allowed to equalize for 15-30 minutes.

Austenitization - This is the main area that gets played with in complex steels. The transformation into the austenite phase and the dissolving of the alloy elements is what happens here. The chromium and molybdenum dissolve, and other carbide formers, like W and V, will stay as carbides to varying degrees. This allows the carbide grains to be somewhat refined, but is mainly a function of the alloy blend. The process for these things to happen takes time......a relatively long time. One must hold the steel accurately at the target temperature for a period of 30 minutes to give these elements time to change their arrangement and get evenly distributed. Rushing the process will greatly affect the HT in the most negative way. This time period starts when the blade reaches the target temperature.
The austenitization range for these steels is from 1800F/980C to 2100F/1150C, with a mid range area around 1950F/1065C. One should test an assure that their ovens are reading the correct temperature. A little off and the results can vary a lot.
The selection of the target temperature will affect the outcome in two ways. The higher the temperature the harder ( wear resistance) the steel gets...and the lower the temperature, the tougher the steel gets. The trade off is a balance of the desired qualities the knife is expected to have. Choppers need more toughness, and slicers need more hardness. For most complex steel knife blades, the middle temperature of the charts is the place to start. Testing of the outcome with your equipment and procedures will tell you if you need to move up or down from there. While a Rockwell test will be of great use in testing the hardness, it won't tell you the whole story, and the knife edge should be tested by other tests designed to show toughness and wear resistance.

Cooling - The steel must be cooled from the austenitized state to a point where it can convert into martensite. The rate that this happens at ( quench speed) and the method will be the second greatest area that affects the final outcome. Most complex steel are classified as air quench steels. That means that the cooling rate of air is fast enough to allow the transformation. All well and good, but we don't just want the blade cooled, we want to control the outcome. This is where a variety of cooling and quenching procedures are applied to guide the steel along to our desired end result. First, the steel needs to drop below the pearlite formation nose...around 900-1000F/500-540C. This drop needs to be done in some way to allow an orderly cooling and avoid warp. There are three ways to do this - 1) cool it in still or moving air. 2) cool it in warm oil. 3) cool it between two large metal plates ( usually aluminum).
Air is going to incur the least stress to the cooling rate, but also may loose some hardness.
Oil is going to assure the fastest cooling, but needs to be an interrupted quench to avoid overly stressing the steel. Done right, it is the most effective method, but there is no way to accurately adjust the rate. It is trial and error, and can change due to many factors.
Plates offer a controlled and repeatable cooling rate as well as help control warping. The entire foil packet can be placed in between the plates and pressed together with moderate pressure to allow transfer of the heat to the aluminum plates, while still excluding oxygen from the hot steel. For most knifemaker purposes , the plates are used at ambient temperature. Chilling the plates in a tub of ice water or a freezer will help, but is unnecessary except for the most difficult steels. If you are having a problem reaching your target hardness, try chilling/freezing the plates and see if that increases the outcome.

Sub-zero and Cryo - The quench does not stop at 900/1000F !!!!. The steel will continue to cool, usually in the quench plates, to below 400F/200C where it starts to convert into martensite. This is called the martensitic conversion start point ,or Ms. On simple steels, this ends somewhere between 80F/25C and 200F/95C . On complex steels it does not end until around -80F/-60C , called the martensitic conversion finish point, or Mf. The austenite to martensite conversion is extremely fast, and there is no need to hold the blade at the sub-zero temperature for any long time. If using liquid nitrogen and doing Cryo, it takes a few hours for the carbides to convert, but the conversion of austenite into martensite happens at the speed of sound. The treatment of the steel during the period between Ms and Mf is the third place that we can greatly affect the outcome. The steel is a mix of retained austenite and martensite at room temperature. Even your home freezer will only slightly affect the transformation. It requires a sub-zero cooling to complete the process. This can be done in a dry ice bath, or done to the most effect in liquid nitrogen. The cooling of the steel from austenite to martensite must be a fairly continuous process without long holds at any point. If you stop the process at any place, some of the austenite will stay there and become stabilized...or retained...austenite. Ra is not harmful in itself, but can affect the hardness of the blade.

Tempering - Upon cooling to the Mf, at -80F/-60C, most of the austenite is converted to martensite, and is a brittle mixture. It is then tempered where we coax it into a more stable and less brittle state. During the temper, the retained austenite is converted into new martensite.
Tempering looses a little hardness, but gains toughness. This is an entirely controllable process, where we get to pick the desired results. Complex steels have two ranges to temper in. The low temperature range assures the high hardness being retained, but does not yield the maximum toughness. Hardness loss is very slow in this range as the temperature increases. The higher temperature range gives maximum toughness, but can reduce the hardness rapidly with only a small variation upward. The temperatures between the two ranges are to be avoided at all costs, as this is where embrittlement occurs. If the tempering is done in the upper range, it should be cooled with a water or oil quench to assure the steel drops through the embrittlement range as fast as possible. Quenching from temper is beneficial in all cases, regardless of steel type. If allowed to cool slowly, the Ra will become stabilized. Since there is no change of state involved, cracking and warp are not an issue in this cooling quench from temper. Once the blade drops to room temperature from the first temper, there is now a mix of tempered martensite, some remaining retained austenite ( less that before), and the newly converted martensite that is still brittle. The New martensite must be tempered, and if we leave the Ra there for even a short time period, it will become permanent. To deal with both these situations, we do a second sub-zero treatment.....immediately after the first temper. Don't wait until tomorrow. The entire Ht process from pre-heat to final temper should be done as one continuous session. This will convert most of the remaining Ra ( all that will convert) and then we can follow this with a second temper cycle. The steel at this point should be mainly tempered martensite and a small amount of retained austenite. If the steel is very complex, a third temper may be beneficial, but additional sub-zero treatments won't gain anything. All tempering cycles are usually two hours periods.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. The more I read about metallurgy, the more I remember. It doesn't all soak in at once. It helps to have it laid out in a reasonable fashion.

Will this be in the stickies somewhere?
 
Thanks Stacy. I appreciate the clear and concise summary.
You're a better man than me. I used my extra hour to sleep!
Roman's research along with Kevin's (and everyome elses)has been invaluable to me as I learn.
 
Sub-zero treatment ...about -100 F [dry ice temps]

Cryogenic treatment ... about -300 F [liquid nitrogen ]

Sub-zero reduces RA, Cryo reduces RA even more but also permits the formation of fine eta carbides upon tempering.

Successful HT of complex steels requires precise time and temperature control.
 
Stacy, it seems to me you're saying it's recommended to quench following temper (i.e. between tempers) even when tempering at the lower ranges?

--nathan
 
Page,
That is correct. The delay in a slow cool to ambient temp can stabilize the Ra. A quench also does some other things.
Roman Landes has written a good bit about this on the other forum. While I don't think it would matter to most of us, metallurgically it is better to quench from temper.....even a low temper. I always did it, but Roman and Kevin explained why it was good.
 
This is an excellent condensed version here Stacy, well done.

There are two subtle points that I think are important that you didn't hit upon that I'd like to touch on if you don't mind. One is the effect of retained austenite.

Retained austenite lowers the measured hardness, but you have to consider what that hardness test is measuring. It is a diamond penetrator, and the areas of retained austenite are soft and mushy and squeeze out of the way, leading to a deeper indent. So a blade with 20% RA that measures HRC 61 will be very different than a blade with 5% RA that also measures HRC 61. The blade with RA will have been tempered at a lower temperature to still maintain that hardness number, perhaps 425F. So it will be a mix of very hard (and brittle) martensite and dead soft RA, which in a blade edge section behaves much like the perforations in a postage stamp. This causes poor fine edge stability. The blade with 5% RA will have been tempered at a higher temperature, perhaps 475. There is an even homogenous structure of tempered martensite. This blade will have noticeably better fine edge stability. Same alloy, same hardness, same grain size, very different blades. RA is a good thing in a stamping tool because it reduces dimensional changes and can impart some impact toughness, but it is a bad thing in a knife blade, particularly the edge.

The other point I'd like to touch on is the secondary hardening hump and why the lower temperature range is better in a knife. Again, it gets around to what the measurement actually means. As the blade gets hotter, the remaining retained austenite converts (yay!), but all the carbon is leaking out of the martensite and forming carbides. This makes a structure that resists the diamond penetrator, so you get a higher measured hardness (the hump) but at the expense of carbon lean martensite. So you end up with a matrix that is free of RA (this improves strength) has a larger carbide fraction (this improves wear resistance in some applications) and softer weaker martensite. So the secondary hardening hump also promotes a structure that suffers poor fine edge stability. And, those carbides were formed at the expense of free chromium, so corrosion resistance is lower. The primary advantage of the higher tempering range is the elimination of the RA. But, as already touched upon, there are other ways of dealing with it.
 
Thanks for the expansion on the tempering and Ra, Nathan

Your points were the reason behind my process for a double or triple temper with a quench from temper, as well as recommending that the lower temper be used.

Some Ra is not a problem....lots of Ra is a big problem. Done by the suggested regimen, the Ra should be below 5%.

I tried to use as few metallurgical terms as possible. Many people stop reading with words like carbide formers, eta carbides, and precipitation hardening :)
 
Stacy, thanks for writing this up. Please make this a sticky!

It would have saved me hours as I was getting started, and should be a great help to new folk, if only to point out that the high-alloy stainless steels take a bit more work for best results.
 
Am I reading correctly ? We should do a second sub-zero quench , one right after the plate quench and again between the 2 tempers .
 
Am I reading correctly ? We should do a second sub-zero quench , one right after the plate quench and again between the 2 tempers .

that is the plan for the most posable reduction of RA

after doing the high temp vs lower temp tempers on 3V i was sold and and never looked back (even with being told i was wrong cause thats not what the data sheet called for)
 
Lloyd is the poster child for this procedure. He didn't think it was necessary until Roman explained it to him and he tried it.

Jack,
Yes, the second sub-zero/cryo will bring the Ra down to the conversion point of -80F and then the newly converted martensite will be tempered by the second temper.
Is it necessary to do two sub-zero/cryo cycles to get a good blade...no ; will it get the most from a complex steel....yes.
 
really stacy i tried it before ever hearing about roman
i knew knives are not dies and dies were HTed for size change (also that only die steels had that kind of temper temps)

another think i didnt liek was the risk of how fast the high temp temper could soften the steel if you over shot it even a little
i saw that other steels without the high temper temp were cryoed and that it brought up hardness (in truth i had no clue about RA at the time i was jsut after harder blades for the kitchen world )

edit to add that maybe i miss read and stacy you mean about the cryo inbetwnne tempers that for sure caught me off gaurd and now understand how it works
 
A very important fact that all of this illustrates is the fact that "manufacturer suggested heat treat protocol" can leave a lot of performance on the table with many of the more complex steels. You hear people talk about heat treat as if you were just baking brownies and accuse those of us who have tried to step out of the box a little as making things more complex than they need to be or even hyping our product. But a lot of the processes discussed in this thread run contrary to a lot of "industry standards" and you'll be hard pressed to read about some of these tweaks in most books on heat treat.
 
I've mentioned that enough Nathan. Lots of difference between 1/8" and 12" thick !
 
wish this was up before i came out looking like an idiot lol i now even furthur understand!! :) two cryos from now on

also i dont know if i was misunderstanding also on one point it was about the temper process. you said ("we do a second sub-zero treatment.....immediately after the first temper") between the temper and the second cryo treatment you should let the steel come to room temperature right? or was it just trying to say not to wait days in between the processes
 
wish this was up before i came out looking like an idiot lol i now even furthur understand!! :) two cryos from now on

also i dont know if i was misunderstanding also on one point it was about the temper process. you said ("we do a second sub-zero treatment.....immediately after the first temper") between the temper and the second cryo treatment you should let the steel come to room temperature right? or was it just trying to say not to wait days in between the processes

Based on what I read today, water quench from first temper, then to second subzero. Probably wouldn't hurt to dry it first.
 
Lloyd - Sorry, I was thinking about another maker, and confused the two of you.

Chad - The time between any step should be fairly short. Ra will stabilize if left alone for any period of time. The graph of your HT should look like a roller coaster, with no flat spots on it. Once the steel becomes austenized, it should be either heating or cooling, but not sitting still.
 
Back
Top