Since I left this thread unresolved so to speak, I felt a need to follow up, just to clear up any misunderstandings some silly putz might have about what happened...Silly putz most certainly NOT being anyone specific, and certainly not any of the forumites that posted with help/advice in this thread, and therefore the classification of putz shall be left up to each invidual's discretion.
Yesterday I took the #303 apart to find out exactly what happened with my ball detent. Not because it was a problem for me, but just because I wanted to know exactly what happened, and to determine if an email to TOPS was warranted.
Close inspection revealed that the ball detent had in fact split in half. Because the remainder was irregularly surfaced, it would seem that the ball detent actually broke in half, as opposed to being sheared. Either of which would be considered a defect, but the difference is important.
If anyone else has had this happen, I would appreciate hearing from them, and I am sure TOPS would also appreciate an email or phone call also. If however this is an isolated case, I guess I would not call it an ongoing QC issue, yet.
Again, the abscence of a ball detent is not a problem for me, and overall I am quite glad it happened as I see it as an improvement, for my purposes. I have not found a knife yet that is 'perfect', and therefore, modifications are almost always required in the pursuit of the perfect knife. Just because this was not a planned modification does not lessen it's value, at least for me. It does serve as a lesson though, in that I now know that the abscence of a ball detent can be a major improvement, and is a modification that is easily done.
Don't be afraid to modify and work on your personal knives in the pursuit of the perfect knife, and you just might find that you reap great rewards and satisfaction.
Having said that, there are of course exceptions to every rule, and some people obviously lack the mental capacity for even the simplest of tasks and should therefore leave well enough alone, for safety's sake...individual discretion is again recommened
