- Joined
- Jul 28, 2003
- Messages
- 2,790
Would you try to appeal to knife knuts or to average demographics?
For example, most people would laugh at the idea of spending even $20 on a knife. That's why SAK ripoff companies can survive- they have horribly substandard products (corkscrews bendable by fingers, blades that just seem to freely wobble when open), and yet people will happily pay $1 for that dollarstore knife than to pay $15-20 for a Victorinox Soldier that could be a great investment. Conversely, there are the steel-snob, picky, spendy knife knuts
like ourselves that would pay >$100 without much thought. So, do you think it would pay off to focus on producing high end knives with a modest but respectable selection of economy options like Benchmade or Spyderco, to focus on mostly low end knives, or to have a lot of mediocre knives that are neither a low price nor a great make (like I've noticed Gerber has been doing with its single blade folders)?
Of course, on principal, I'd much rather produce high end knives, but I wonder which would be a better payoff financially?
For example, most people would laugh at the idea of spending even $20 on a knife. That's why SAK ripoff companies can survive- they have horribly substandard products (corkscrews bendable by fingers, blades that just seem to freely wobble when open), and yet people will happily pay $1 for that dollarstore knife than to pay $15-20 for a Victorinox Soldier that could be a great investment. Conversely, there are the steel-snob, picky, spendy knife knuts

Of course, on principal, I'd much rather produce high end knives, but I wonder which would be a better payoff financially?