imperfect knives you like

Yes, especially when I get them dirt cheap and then fix it.

Of course, the spine whack is still not certifiably a test recognizing the knife's integrity. Some think it's an exercise in abuse as few if ever would experience failure while holding the scales in a normal manner. Which invites testing the knife holding the scales while whacking the back of the blade against hard objects until it fails, and asking yourself, what did I just prove?

Now, lock failure in use while torquing, twisting, or prying, that's more real world, but how many of us are going to buy stainless kevlar fish cleaning glove and lay into a test routine to discover that? So we use the spine whack. It's really not fair, and it's no wonder most makers avoid the whole subject other that suggest it's abusive.

I have a Buck Mayo TNT that won't close all the way to the detent, but that's little problem in tip down carry. It doesn't affect my opinion at all - it's a very good knife, and a great user.
 
The Sebenza.

The scales don't offer enough traction when used under adverse conditions, but the rest of the knife makes up for it.
 
I had a buck 889 that failed the spine whack test but i still loved that knife. It was stolen in a trade when i wasn't paying attention but i'll get it back someday, great knife. later,ahgar
 
The Strider SNG from which the blade wiggled back and forth & that the stop pin fell out shortly after buying it.

I got the offer to sent it back, but decided it to tricky to do so.

Fixed the wiggling and made a new stop pin and now the knife is one of my favourite EDC's, especially after convexing.
:)
 
I had a Colt Police Positive Special knife, that even though it was a cheaper knife, it had great ergonomics.

Sadly it had a very smooth and light pocket clip and I lost it somewhere.

It was an early one, from I think the first run in Germany, and when I went to replace it, United Cutlery had switched to Asian manufacturer and they just didn't seem as good.
 
Back
Top