INFI Secrets Revealed! Fox News!

Joined
Mar 18, 2006
Messages
520
Watching a Fox News snip about genetically engineering corn to better use nitrogen, I was reminded of the Periodic Table. Since I read a lot of periodicals, I can read this one too...:cool:

It's been revealed elsewhere that INFI is 99.89% metal and carbon, with 0.11% nitrogen by WEIGHT. The metals, however, are 6400 times the density of nitrogen! If one were to cut a chunk of INFI that weighed 100 g, the 99.89 g's of metals and carbon (solids) would be about 12.48 cc's. The 0.11 g's of nitrogen would be about 88 cc's, a colorless invisible gas! So INFI is actually 88 cc nitrogen / 100.48 cc total = 87.5% gas by volume !

So now we can see that 87.5% of a Busse Combat blade is an inert, colorless, invisible, odorless gas! "Ha", you say! Well, the irrefutable facts are there. The only things left are conjecture:

How can a mostly gaseous material be tempered, let alone ground?

We know that oxygen and acetalene gases with heat can cut steel, so how is that related to the cutting prowess of INFI? Where's the heat?

Is the Busse compound "closed" because they secretly grow special nitrogen-rich corn for the military? Maybe the blades are just a diversionary front!:eek:

If 87.5% of a Busse Combat blade is invisible, how big are they REALLY?

My research for answers to these and similar compelling questions continues. Meanwhile, my plan to reforge a BATAC into a thin helmet (replacing my aluminum foil one) is on hold: one made of 87.5% clear gas would afford little or no protection from the various rays, beams, and waves. Maybe H1 steel (a rusty helmet sucks)? :D Regards, ss.
 
I am simply dazzled by your logic! I hope you will next apply your vision to getting the bugs out of cold fusion--we could really use it now.
 
Watching a Fox News snip about genetically engineering corn to better use nitrogen, I was reminded of the Periodic Table. Since I read a lot of periodicals, I can read this one too...:cool:

It's been revealed elsewhere that INFI is 99.89% metal and carbon, with 0.11% nitrogen by WEIGHT. The metals, however, are 6400 times the density of nitrogen! If one were to cut a chunk of INFI that weighed 100 g, the 99.89 g's of metals and carbon (solids) would be about 12.48 cc's. The 0.11 g's of nitrogen would be about 88 cc's, a colorless invisible gas! So INFI is actually 88 cc nitrogen / 100.48 cc total = 87.5% gas by volume !

So now we can see that 87.5% of a Busse Combat blade is an inert, colorless, invisible, odorless gas! "Ha", you say! Well, the irrefutable facts are there. The only things left are conjecture:

How can a mostly gaseous material be tempered, let alone ground?

We know that oxygen and acetalene gases with heat can cut steel, so how is that related to the cutting prowess of INFI? Where's the heat?

Is the Busse compound "closed" because they secretly grow special nitrogen-rich corn for the military? Maybe the blades are just a diversionary front!:eek:

If 87.5% of a Busse Combat blade is invisible, how big are they REALLY?

My research for answers to these and similar compelling questions continues. Meanwhile, my plan to reforge a BATAC into a thin helmet (replacing my aluminum foil one) is on hold: one made of 87.5% clear gas would afford little or no protection from the various rays, beams, and waves. Maybe H1 steel (a rusty helmet sucks)? :D Regards, ss.

Obviouslyy the rantings of a mad man. . . move along now . . . there's nothing to see here. . . . .

(SS, use your decoder ring to read your next mission below!)


. . . .(. . . . You've said too much!!!!!!. TAKE the little white pill. . . .. . .Do it !!!!. . . .Do it now!!!!!!. . . . .) . . . .

Jerry :D
 
I think your weight to volume converison factors must be off. Why do you assume that the Nitrogen exists in INFI in the same form that one finds it in nature. Anyway Infi might not obey the usual laws of physics :)
 
confused.jpg
 
Guyon I have asked you to not post that picture of me on the internet.... The hat looks good on me but yellow is just not my color. :D
 
Straitshot, that was hysterical! Having spent most of the last 18 years working almost exclusively with and for PHD'd theoretical physicists, your analysis reminded me of waaaay too many early Monday morning engineering staff meetings - it was in one of those meetings that I awoke from a slumber and muttered the classic line...'The only difference between theory and reality, is that in theory there is no difference'...

Jerry, time to send in the big guns and shut this guy up...I think he's on to you bro! ;)

Shel

p.s. Was watching the newest Mars lander 'stuff' on the NASA channel the other night when I saw the laser comms and thought to myself 'Hey, I recognize that, I helped build and test the prototype some 15 years ago...hmm, so, that's where it went' (lost track of it once the USAF snatched it away from the USN...but how the heck did it end up in Canada?)
 
Back
Top