- Joined
- Sep 28, 2005
- Messages
- 4,527
Just wanted to open a dialogue about carrying irreplaceable knives. Personally I hate the term as to me all knives are made of materials easily found, and can be remade. I buy knives to cut stuff with as well as display, but have no concern about a specific knife. I would be sad to loose the first knife my wife bought me, or the Elishewitz knife that is probably the pinnacle of my collection in terms of construction, materials, and name. It would hurt to loose the knife my mom gave me in grade 8, and has been my wallet knife since- even though I haven't carried a wallet in years. But there is nothing so special about them that I would call irreplaceable. I have memories tied to them, sure, but the memories are beyond the object, and more about the person. I lost my first knife, a little puuko from Bödo Norway. I've never seen another like it, and the exact knife is long gone, but if I remake it, or ever find another, then it can be replaced.
It is even more confusing to me when the knife in question is a production knife- they made many, therefore there will be more to find. I guess the fact that I have overlap in my knives and if one is lost or broken it will be missed, yet replaced has something to do with my opinion.
If you have an irreplaceable knife- please share why it is that way to you, and why you choose to use/not use/carry/not carry it. No right or wrong, I would like to understand your take more on this.
It is even more confusing to me when the knife in question is a production knife- they made many, therefore there will be more to find. I guess the fact that I have overlap in my knives and if one is lost or broken it will be missed, yet replaced has something to do with my opinion.
If you have an irreplaceable knife- please share why it is that way to you, and why you choose to use/not use/carry/not carry it. No right or wrong, I would like to understand your take more on this.