The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
True.
what if I have to use it in a fight and the cops catch me with it?
The original Kubotan, as designed by Tak Kubota and marketed by Monadnock Lifetime Products, is nothing more than a 5-or-6" piece of heavy-duty plastic. You could even save yourself some money by cutting off a similar length of broomhandle. I have yet to hear of a jurisdiction where they are illegal.Oh, I agree. Part of me is more afraid of the police than any "badguy" out there.
I remember visiting Colorado and seeing guys openly carrying handguns and KA Bar Bowie knives on their hips. In NYC, you have a spyderco in your pocket and the cops flip out and want to arrest you.
I just want to cover all my bases. I used to carry a standard folding knife on a clip in my pocket, now I carry a 3 inch cold steel voyager in my pocket with no clip, just so a cop wont stop me.
It's pretty stupid. I think a kubotan is more practical in NY. And if I have to use it to save my ass, I dont want to go to jail for a weapons charge.
It is what it is.
Kubotans fall under " any item designed for use as a weapon" so yes they are illegal. A solid metal pen or collapsable pointer is not unless carried or used as a weapon.
I have yet to hear of a jurisdiction where they are illegal.
glistam section 265.15 #4 reads.....
"The possession by any person of any dagger, dirk, stiletto, dangerous knife or any other weapon, instrument, appliance or substance designed, made or adapted for use primarily as a weapon, is presumptive evidence of intent to use the same unlawfully against another. "
The judge will not( and has not) seen it your way. They are designed clearly as a weapon and the law defines that as intent.
glistam section 265.15 #4 reads.....
"The possession by any person of any dagger, dirk, stiletto, dangerous knife or any other weapon, instrument, appliance or substance designed, made or adapted for use primarily as a weapon, is presumptive evidence of intent to use the same unlawfully against another. "
The judge will not( and has not) seen it your way. They are designed clearly as a weapon and the law defines that as intent.