Is Google Good or Bad?

Joe Dirt

Banned
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
855
What do you think?

Is Google a nice company that has great technology and good motive?

Are they an evil company that plays nice up front but has bad motives behind closed doors?

Are they too big? Are they like Big Brother?

Just wondered what you think.

Are they better, worse, or the same as Yahoo! or Microsoft?

I'm kind of leaning more on them being evil and hoarding too much information.
 
Yeah, I think they keep all the *really* good information in filing cabinets in a warehouse in the Bronx. Damnable hoarders. That's what they are.
 
Google is pretty evil, but it wouldn't be a good thing for anyone to have that much power. It's a temporary thing, I hope. For a while Google had a better search engine than anyone else and everybody started using them, and although other search engines have caught up since then, people keep using Google out of inertia. There's no reason to change ... until they realize how much power Google has and how they're misusing it, or until someone else comes up with a better search engine. The sooner the better, IMHO.
 
Cougar Allen said:
Google is pretty evil, but it wouldn't be a good thing for anyone to have that much power. It's a temporary thing, I hope. For a while Google had a better search engine than anyone else and everybody started using them, and although other search engines have caught up since then, people keep using Google out of inertia. There's no reason to change ... until they realize how much power Google has and how they're misusing it, or until someone else comes up with a better search engine. The sooner the better, IMHO.

I googled your response, and it came back with one word:

LIAR!!!!!

and now I see some guys dressed in silly jackets poking around outside.

What does this mean?:confused:
 
Google = Bad.

Google Desktop collects all your correspondence, spreadsheets etc and uploads it to their own servers to help you archive it. GMail, archives all your mail including what you have deleted. They have said it is for Government to subpoena if needed.

I saw this today

Google admits Desktop security risk
By Tom Espiner
Special to CNET News.com

Published: February 20, 2006, 9:50 AM PST
Businesses have been warned by research company Gartner that the latest Google Desktop Beta has an "unacceptable security risk," and Google agrees.

On Feb. 9, Google unveiled Google Desktop 3, a free, downloadable program that includes an option to let users search across multiple computers for files. To do that, the application automatically stores copies of files, for up to a month, on Google servers. From there, copies are transferred to the user's other computers for archiving. The data is encrypted in transmission and while stored on Google servers.

The risk to enterprises, according to Gartner, lies in how this shared information is pooled by Google. The data is transferred to a remote server, where it is stored and can then be shared between users for up to 30 days.

Gartner said in a report on Thursday that the "mere transport (of data) outside the enterprise will represent an unacceptable security risk to many enterprises," as intellectual property could be transported out of the business.

Google told ZDNet UK on Monday that it recognized the risk, and recommended that companies take action. "We recognize that this is a big issue for enterprise. Yes, it's a risk, and we understand that businesses may be concerned," said Andy Ku, European marketing manager for Google.

Google confirmed to ZDNet UK that data was temporarily transported outside of businesses when the Search Across Computers feature was used, and that this represented "as much of a security risk as e-mail does."

"Theoretically any intellectual property can be transferred outside of a company," Ku said. "We understand that there are a lot of security concerns about the Search Across Computers feature, but Google won't hold information unless the user or enterprise opts in (to the feature)."

Google said that security was the concern of individual businesses. "The burden falls on enterprises to look after security issues," Ku said. "Companies can disable the Search Across Computers facility."

Gartner said that sensitive documents may be inadvertently shared by workers, who may not have specialist knowledge of regulatory or security restrictions.

Google said it was unable to comment on the risks posed when individuals share sensitive information. "Some users may, and some users may not be able to," said Ku, adding that companies should follow their own policies.

"At the end of the day, each company should make its own decision. If they are uncomfortable, they shouldn't enable the feature," Ku said. "It's about what a company deems to be best corporate policy."

Gartner has recommended that businesses use Google Desktop for Enterprise, as this allows systems administrators to centrally turn off the Search Across Computers feature, which it said should be "immediately disabled."

Companies "must also evaluate what they are allowing to be indexed, and whether they are comfortable that they can adequately bar the sharing of data with Google's servers," said Gartner.

Google agreed that Google Desktop Enterprise would better mitigate security risks. "If you're given a choice, choose Enterprise," said Ku.
 
Back
Top