Here is a 4" folder made by Robert Sims. It is not a high end knife ($100 for knife & sheath on secondary market) but i present it to ask some questions.
nice sheath:
All i can find out about Robert Sims is that he made his first knife in 1975, that he is a member of the Knifemakers Guild and that he sells at knife shows.
I bought this knife from the original owner who purchased it from Mr. Sims at a knife show in 2002.
I cannot find another example of his work.
Does anyone here know of Robert Sims or have one of his knives ?
My next question concerns blade grind which i hope you can see. The mirror finish makes it hard to "photograph". The plunge line curves in whereas all my other knives have a straight plunge line. Is this because of type of tool used to grind the blade ?
Is it of any significance ? The primary grind is rather shallow and the blade is still thicker than on most customs when measured just above the edge grind.
The edge is hair poppin sharp. Comments about this grind will be appreciated.
And finally, the seller thought the handles to be bone, but it looks like ivory to me. What does it look like to you ?
Concerning Mammoth ivory, is this fossilized ? i.e. have the minerals in it been replaced so that it becomes a rock or stone ? or is it simply a very old (10,000 yrs app.) tusk that has been preserved in it's original state ?
thanks for any help with my 4 (?) questions.
roland





nice sheath:

All i can find out about Robert Sims is that he made his first knife in 1975, that he is a member of the Knifemakers Guild and that he sells at knife shows.
I bought this knife from the original owner who purchased it from Mr. Sims at a knife show in 2002.
I cannot find another example of his work.
Does anyone here know of Robert Sims or have one of his knives ?
My next question concerns blade grind which i hope you can see. The mirror finish makes it hard to "photograph". The plunge line curves in whereas all my other knives have a straight plunge line. Is this because of type of tool used to grind the blade ?
Is it of any significance ? The primary grind is rather shallow and the blade is still thicker than on most customs when measured just above the edge grind.
The edge is hair poppin sharp. Comments about this grind will be appreciated.
And finally, the seller thought the handles to be bone, but it looks like ivory to me. What does it look like to you ?
Concerning Mammoth ivory, is this fossilized ? i.e. have the minerals in it been replaced so that it becomes a rock or stone ? or is it simply a very old (10,000 yrs app.) tusk that has been preserved in it's original state ?
thanks for any help with my 4 (?) questions.
roland